Language selection

Search


2022 to 2023 Departmental Results Report: Canada Border Services Agency – Supplementary information tables

Gender-Based analysis Plus (GBA Plus)

Section 1: Institutional GBA Plus capacity

Governance

Since October 2022, increased resources were allocated to the CBSA’s GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility to better develop its GBA Plus capacity. The Centre of Responsibility now has a dedicated full-time manager as well as three full-time employees.

In the 2022 to 2023 fiscal year, the GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility delivered nine information sessions to employees, including senior management, with the goal of raising awareness of how GBA Plus supports more robust policies, programs and initiatives that aid in reducing inequity.

The GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility has also improved its consultation process with internal stakeholders to help them generate ideas on how to apply GBA Plus to their specific initiatives. The Centre of Responsibility aims to respond to emails within three business days. Last fiscal year, the GBA Plus team met with 23 areas across the Agency to provide support and guidance on how to apply GBA Plus to their activities.

To ensure that its services meet organizational needs, the GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility has implemented self-assessment improvements; created an internal consultation guide and feedback survey; and ensured effective consultations by conducting research and asking clients for information as needed.

The GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility is also working with the Chief Data Office and the Finance and Corporate Management Branch to create a yearly action plan that supports program areas in completing GBA Plus reporting requirements for the Departmental Results Report in line with the methodology of the GBA Plus section of the Management Accountability Framework.

Capacity

GBA plus data-related initiatives

In the 2022 to 2023 fiscal year, the GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility launched two data-related initiatives to help the Agency improve in meeting the requirements of the Canadian Gender Budgeting Act:

  1. GBA Plus data collection and analytics pilot

This pilot was launched in January 2023 and involves three CBSA programs (Recourse, Criminal Investigations, and Field Technology Support). Participants began by answering key GBA Plus questions about their programs (such as the type of data collected and existing data sets) and committed to regular meetings with the GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility and the Chief Data Office. The pilot’s objective is for programs to develop a data collection and analytics strategy that will enable them to measure the impact of their programs on gender and diversity, as required by the Canadian Gender Budgeting Act. Preliminary results are expected in the 2023 to 2024 fiscal year.

The GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility and the Chief Data Office worked together to design tools based on the GBA Plus framework, including a GBA Plus question grid; participant survey; self-assessment; informational documents; resource list for participants; focus group questions; and an adapted version of the Chief Data Office’s sociotechnical review grid.

  1. GBA Plus Data Collection Plan

In March 2023, a second data-related initiative was launched to assist programs not part of the GBA Plus pilot, with the goal of supporting them in creating and implementing a GBA Plus data collection plan. All programs not part of the pilot were invited to participate in this initiative.

GBA Plus Think Tank

The CBSA’s Research Unit, in collaboration with the GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility, has launched an experimental research activity ("Think Tank") with external stakeholders on exploring the impacts of the Agency’s approach to GBA Plus data collection and application. By creating a space for sharing varied and diverse views and experiences, the Think Tank will explore the nexuses between the Agency’s functions and GBA Plus identity factors.

The Agency is committed to continually evolving its processes to reduce bias and prevent discrimination. The various functions of the Agency are at different stages in meeting their GBA Plus goals, and while many functions currently collect, generate and/or apply GBA Plus data, some are still in the preliminary stages. The Think Tank will convene participants, both internal and external to the Agency, including participants from academia, immigration and refugee organizations, and more, in order to explore how institutional, cultural and technical barriers can be reduced.

This initiative aims to create a space for dynamic research and data gathering through a fluid exchange of knowledge and storytelling, leading to tangible recommendations that will ultimately inform policy development. Participants will focus on generating new knowledge by building upon documented and undocumented practices. As such, they will participate both as representatives of their organizations and also as individual citizens with their own unique identity factors and experiences. To do so, qualitative and quantitative data, grounded in both explicit and tacit knowledge, will inform discussions. This approach will allow for a deeper understanding of the impacts of compounding inequalities in the application of CBSA program and policy development.

Additional GBA Plus activities

In addition to the initiatives led by the GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility, CBSA branches undertook their own activities to better support GBA Plus institutional capacity. For example, the Intelligence and Enforcement Branch (IEB) created a GBA Plus Action Plan to improve the ability of its programs to report on gender and diversity impacts, and to help ensure the meaningful integration of GBA Plus considerations into their work.

IEB’s efforts to prioritize GBA Plus have also been shared and showcased across the Agency through senior management’s participation in the GBA Plus Leaders event, which took place as part of GBA Plus Awareness Week.

The Centre of Responsibility was included as a key player in working group discussions to update the Performance Information Profiles for IEB programs, with the addition of GBA Plus indicators featured as a key action item for consideration.

Section 2: Highlights of GBA Plus results reporting capacity by program core responsability

Core Responsibility: Border management

Program Name: Anti-dumping and Countervailing

Program Goals: The program supports Canadian producers who face unfair foreign competition in the domestic marketplace. The program is responsible for the administration of the Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), which helps protect Canadian industry from injury caused by the dumping and subsidizing of imported goods.

Target Population: Canadian producers (such as steel producers) is the specific sector of the economy affected by the program.

Distribution of Benefits: Canadian producers benefit by being protected from border-related risks, specifically those who are protected from unfairly dumped and subsidized imports, and by ensuring that importers are compliant with SIMA measures. The program directly helps protect Canadian jobs and production levels.

Specific Demographic Group Outcomes: Specific industries or sectors of the economy (Canadian producers who face unfair foreign competition in the domestic marketplace).

Key Program Impacts on Gender and Diversity: Not available. The program is currently not able to measure its impact on gender and diversity.

Currently, the CBSA does not collect GBA Plus data on companies or individuals within a company that interact with this program, however the Agency intends to begin collecting data in 2024-25.

Actions taken in 2022-23:

  • January to present: Guidance provided to program staff on the use of gender-inclusive language when corresponding with colleagues or clients, as provided by the Translation Bureau, which can be found here.

Key Program Impacts on Gender and Diversity: The program is not able to measure its impact on gender and diversity for 2022-23 because the data was not collected.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: Currently, the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Program and the CBSA at large do not collect GBA Plus data on companies or individuals within a company that interact with this program. Although there may be data available on various companies and industry sectors in Statistics Canada, for example, this data does not sufficiently enable the program to measure impacts on gender and diversity. Additionally, the program cannot substantiate external sources of data to those companies or individuals that interact with this program. As a result, the program intends to begin collecting data in 2024-25 based on the following planned actions.

Planned actions:

The Trade and Anti-dumping Programs Directorate (TAPD) will implement a GBA Plus data collection strategy. The strategy will enable TAPD to identify and address gaps related to gender and diversity (e.g., more education and promotion in specific demographics such as gender, ethnicity, culture, age, language and geographical areas where gaps have been identified). TAPD will invite 100% of regular users of the anti-dumping program, such as steel producers represented by the Canadian Steel Producers Association and other industry-based producers, to participate in the data collection in the form of a survey. While this will be a voluntary method of participation, TAPD aims to base the analysis on a response rate of 56% (recommended to be a meaningful sample size by statistics and market research). The scope of the data collection will be developed in October 2023 as per the detailed action plan. Once data has been received and analyzed, the results will enable TAPD to work to address previously undetected barriers to compliance.

The plan will focus efforts where TAPD programs engage with sectors of the economy. This TAPD implementation will be launched in 2023-24 through the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Program, and may be applied in other TAPD programs where possible, such as the Trade Facilitation and Compliance Program. The planned actions are:

  1. TAPD CBSA Assessment and Revenue Management (CARM) team to update the CARM software requirements – October 2023.
    • a. Include the requirement to update the language in the CARM Client Portal (CCP) in a future CARM release to consider GBA Plus considerations.
    • b. Include the requirement to support a potential survey and facilitate a data collection process through the CCP in a future CARM release.
  2. Conduct an analysis to identify TAPD points of service – December 2023.
    • a. Identify points of service throughout TAPD programs.
    • b. Categorize interaction by company or individual:
      • i. Individual interaction may require customized demographic data;
      • ii. Company interaction may require customization to collect leadership, board and organizational considerations.
  3. Conduct a risk assessment of applicability and methodology of data collection for each program to mitigate a negative reaction from the public – January 2024.
    • a. There may be programs that require a level of neutrality and additional levels of sensitivity. The risk assessment will facilitate the categorization of engagement to:
      • i. Initial contact survey (e.g., “Tell us more about you”);
      • ii. Post-engagement survey (e.g., “How did we do to meet your needs?”; “Are there ways we can improve our communication with you?”);
      • iii. A voluntary survey at any point in time
  4. Develop a stand-alone survey for the Trade Facilitation Compliance Program – February 2024.
    • a. Consult with internal and external subject matter experts such as:
      • i. CBSA Communications Directorate;
      • ii. Information, Science and Technology Branch.
    • b. This survey may accompany existing materials at different points of service. The survey form may be offered during the interaction with a company or individual when appropriate. The potential points of service are:
      • i. All licence applications (e.g., warehouses; duty-free stores; brokers; Duties Relief program applications);
      • ii. As part of the payment process of the broker licensing fee;
      • iii. D-Memos;
      • iv. Advance Rulings;
      • v. Refund submission process;
      • vi. CARM portal registration/program enrollment.
  5. Develop survey data collection framework – February 2024.
    • a. Identify methods of survey collection, TAPD unit/resource responsible to receive and analyze surveys.
    • b. Consult:
      • i. Regional resources;
      • ii. GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility;
      • iii. Communications Directorate;
      • iv. Information, Science and Technology Branch;
      • v. Finance and Corporate Management Branch;
      • vi. Human Resources.
    • c. Analysis and approval by senior management.
  6. Survey review and consultations – February to March 2024.
    • a. Conduct a program-level review.
    • b. Consult external subject matter experts such as the Border Commercial Consultative Committee and other industry associations.
  7. Survey implementation – May 2024.
    • a. Electronic dissemination (e.g., email correspondence).
    • b. Web-based resources (e.g., CBSA website).
    • c. Include the requirement to update the language in the CCP in a future CARM release to consider GBA Plus considerations.
    • d. Include the requirement to support a potential survey and facilitate a data collection process through the CCP in a future CARM release.
  8. Share initial results of key impact analysis regarding areas of improvement as part of the Departmental Results Report supplementary information table – June 2024.
  9. Survey collection – June 2024 to June 2025.
  10. Survey analysis and report – September 2025.
  11. Senior management to review and approve the GBA Plus action plan – October 2025.

Program name: Buildings and Equipment

Program goals: The Buildings and Equipment Program oversees infrastructure and equipment maintenance activities and capital investments delivered at the CBSA’s air, land and marine ports of entry (POEs), at the CBSA College, at Immigration Holding Centers, and at staff housing units, in support of travel and trade activities. The program ensures that the infrastructure and equipment are suitable, sustainable, safe, resilient and operational for Agency staff and members of the public through appropriate asset lifecycle management activities and accessibility management. As part of accessibility management, GBA Plus is incorporated into the building designs for port replacements and/or constructions, ensuring barrier-free access at CBSA POEs. The integrated GBA Plus design elements include textured flooring and non-gendered facilities that will enhance accessibility for the visually impaired and create barrier free facilities for all genders.

Target population:

  • All Canadians
  • A particular demographic group:
  • Persons with disabilities or health issues or their caregivers
  • Women
  • Men
  • 2SLGBTQI+

Distribution of benefits:

  Group
By gender Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By healthcare characteristics Persons with disability
Persons with physical or mental health issues (or their caregivers)

Specific demographic group outcomes: All Canadians, specifically the demographic of those with vision impairment or facing gender-based barriers, will benefit directly from the incorporated GBA Plus elements.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: Not available. The incorporation of GBA Plus in POE design is still in the early stages of implementation. Data on key program impacts on gender and diversity is currently unavailable.

Key program impact statistics:

Statistics Observed results Data source Comment

Discussions underway to develop indicator.

Number of new POEs delivered following Land Border Crossing Project (LBCP) Schedule Wave 1 with the new design features applied.

Updated POE design guide LBCP Wave 1 Delivery Schedule LBCP does not include Immigration Holding Centres or the CBSA College.

Other key program impacts: First POE with these GBA Plus elements will be completed this fiscal year. The design guide itself has incorporated these elements of GBA Plus and will become the template of future LBCPs. Textured flooring is expected to benefit persons with vision impairment by providing additional sensory input with navigation. Non-gendered facilities are expected to benefit broadly gender-balanced groups by removing gender-based barriers that may exclude certain groups from fully utilizing onsite facilities.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: Ad-hoc collaboration with internal project team to collect and analyze GBA Plus outcomes as they relate to program activities.

Program name: Commercial Facilitation and Compliance

Program goals: The Commercial Facilitation and Compliance Program contributes to overall border management and assists in the interdiction of risks associated with the free flow of commercial goods into, through, and out of Canada. This includes using a risk-based approach, leveraging data analytics, ensuring the consistent application of compliance methods, and using education and industry cooperation to promote fairness and facilitation.

Target population: Without targeting a specific population, the program impacts all Canadians, from various socio-demographic groups involved in the sending or receiving of electronic or paper communications from the Agency. The program also impacts a wide range of industry partners across the globe seeking to conduct commercial-based business transactions with the Agency through the import or export, or both, of goods into and out of Canada.

Distribution of benefits: The program has benefits nationally and on a global scale by reaching its facilitation and compliance objectives and aiding in the assurance that commercial goods and conveyances are not considered a health, safety or security threat to Canada and Canadians or to the global population when exiting Canada.

  Group
By gender Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes: The program is beneficial to business owners who seek to import or export, or both, legitimate goods into, through or out of Canada by providing education, aiding in facilitation, and ensuring voluntary compliance using a compliance and risk-based approach. It also benefits all Canadians by offering a diversity of goods and preventing dangerous or inadmissible goods from entering Canada, as well as by supporting a global advantage on Canadian exports and aligning with international and partnering customs organizations.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: Not available. The program cannot currently report on its key impacts on gender and diversity.

Other key program impacts: In collaboration with the GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility, the program has updated its guidelines on how to address clients, with the objective of being more inclusive of people with diverse gender identity or expression. Guidelines were updated to encourage gender neutral or inclusive language in both English and French.

To date, most employees have a good understanding of unconscious bias through training, which assists in fostering a more positive relationship with external clients from various equity-seeking groups. This training focused on bias related to ethnicity and race, in collaboration with the Canadian Anti-Racism Network.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: The Commercial Program Directorate will implement a GBA Plus data collection strategy, which will enable the program to identify and address gaps related to the following identity factors selected: gender, age, ethnicity, geographic area, and disability/accessibility. To do so, the program will collect information on the industry sector that companies belong to, as well as their business size. It would then be possible to see the distinct socio-demographic composition of industry sectors and what challenges or barriers they face.

The program will collect and analyze data to identify its policies impacted by gender and diversity. More specifically, the objective of the data collection strategy is to identify how policies related to the program as well as the risk-based approach concerning import and export may impact various socio-demographic groups differently. The program will look into the identity factors mentioned above to better understand the challenges faced by underrepresented groups operating within the trade community.

Collecting and analyzing the data will allow the program to determine if (and which) identity factors related to gender, age, ethnicity and disability face additional or specific challenges in complying with program requirements.

Planned actions:

  • 1. August to December 2023: Conduct an analysis to identify which policies and programs are under Program and Policy Management Division purview to establish a repository of feedback via points of service received.
  • 2. January 2024 to January 2025: Collect data and conduct analysis on industry sector, business size, geographic area and disability through a survey:
    • a) Industry Sector: The program will collect information on the industry sector that companies belong to. It would then be possible to see the distinct socio-demographic composition of industry sectors and what challenges or barriers they face.
    • b) Business Size: The program will collect data from government sources (e.g., Statistics Canada) and industry sources (e.g., industry associations) on small- and medium-sized business in order to identify additional or specific challenges to underrepresented groups.
    • c) Geographic Area: The program will collect information about the location of operations in order to see the distinct socio-demographic composition of geographic areas and what challenges or barriers they face (e.g., technical barriers to registration).
    • d) Disability/Accessibility: The program will collect data on the accessibility of external-facing points of service to the public, and to ensure all posted information is up-to-date and relevant.
  • 3. May 2024: Present initial results in terms of key impacts on gender and diversity to senior management for discussion.
  • 4. June 2024: Report on initial results of key impact analysis regarding areas of improvement for the GBA Plus Management Accountability Framework as part of the Departmental Results Report supplementary information table.
  • 5. May 2025: Present final results in terms of key impacts on gender and diversity to senior management for discussion.
  • 6. June to September 2025: Create action plan to address identified gaps based on results of the analysis conducted.

Program Name: Field Technology Support

Program goals:The Field Technology Support (FTS) program provides integrated border services that support national security and public safety priorities and facilitate the free flow of people and goods, including animals and plants, that meet all requirements under the program legislation. The FTS program conducts analytical and forensic analysis, including suspected contraband, documents, images, trade commodities, excise instruments and radiation detection, to support program legislation and border services officer health and safety. It also provides detection technology support to the Agency as the Technical Authority on detection technologies and tools under its Lifecycle Management Framework. The FTS program carries out a wide range of activities related to the lifecycle of detection technology assets, instruments, sensors, devices, tools, and networks that are employed at the border, and contributes to the Departmental Results and program-level outcomes by reporting on the following key performance indicators:

  • The number of analytical and forensic samples processed;
  • The percentage of analytical and forensic samples analyzed within the service target;
  • The operational availability of detection technology in the field;
  • The operational availability of health and safety equipment/detection technology in the field.

Target population: All Canadians is the target population of the FTS program as it is a program that supports public safety.

Distribution of benefits:

  Group
By gender Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes: The FTS program is directly responsible for supporting the health and safety of the scientists who use laboratory instruments to perform analysis, the field technicians who are responsible for repairing and maintaining the equipment used in the field, and the border services officers who operate the detection technology equipment at the various ports of entry across Canada. The FTS program indirectly impacts the well-being of the Canadian public by providing expert guidance, equipment and tools to conduct business and allow people and goods to flow safely and freely into Canada. The impacts of the accessibility of laboratory instruments and detection technology equipment can affect anyone where an issue exists that limits a person’s ability to perform their duties (e.g., a physical disability). While there is insufficient data to adequately assess the scale of the direct and indirect benefits at this time, collecting survey data on accessibility will provide the FTS program with the means to quantitatively assess the inclusivity and usability of the laboratory instruments and detection technology equipment employed across the country. 

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: Not currently available. The FTS program is at the beginning of its data collection strategy. It is anticipated that this information will be available in June 2024.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: As an organization, we recognize that we have a responsibility of widening our understanding of GBA Plus in order to be better positioned to identify tools or processes that currently exist or that need to be created to increase our inclusiveness within multiple diverse groups under GBA Plus. To achieve this, the FTS program is adopting a data collection strategy that includes a streamlined survey with a section dedicated to collecting data on GBA Plus. The focus for the FTS program is to increase the accessibility of laboratory instruments and detection technology through the procurement of goods and services. The data collection will provide the FTS program with an opportunity to identify gaps and explore whether a need exists to adjust certain laboratory instruments or pieces of detection technology equipment to become more accessible to a wider group of people.

The FTS program currently conducts several surveys annually soliciting feedback from clients to ensure that program performance indicators are being met. The survey data enables the FTS program to measure the effectiveness of delivering quality support and services to the CBSA and other government departments (e.g., Canada Revenue Agency). In 2023-24, the FTS program will adopt a new data collection strategy to include a streamlined survey with a section dedicated to collecting data on GBA Plus. The survey data collected will provide the FTS program with a means to identify and assess the accessibility, effectiveness and safety of laboratory instruments and detection technology equipment in use. The data will assist in determining whether barriers exist for the use of laboratory instruments and detection technology equipment for specific groups (e.g., people with disabilities) and accessibility for all body types (e.g., heights, weights and genders) for the equipment to be used correctly and effectively by everyone and thereby creating a more diverse workforce.

Consultations are underway with subject matter experts at the laboratory in Ottawa. Certain areas where accessibility issues and/or other possible barriers might exist have been identified and will provide the foundation for the data collection strategy.

The next steps and anticipated timelines for the FTS data collection strategy are:

  • May to November 2023: Engagement with FTS program managers to streamline existing surveys into one cohesive survey with a section dedicated to GBA Plus.
  • June to November 2023: Development of a draft data collection plan and communication strategy (who are we going to target and how do we reach them).
  • October 2023 to April 2024: Identify resources to provide administrative support (overseeing survey distribution and data collection). Survey preparation and implementation phase.
  • April 2024: Data collection phase.
  • April to June 2024: Data analysis phase and preparation of final report.
  • July 2024: Presentation of initial results of the GBA Plus pilot project to senior management.

The survey will assist the FTS program to determine who is using the laboratory instruments and detection technology equipment at the various ports of entry; how it is being used; and how can it be adapted to make it more accessible to everyone. Collecting survey data on accessibility will provide clients and staff with a means of communicating their needs, while providing the FTS program with a method of measuring whether those needs are being met.

By identifying unforeseen barriers, we can ensure that the FTS program continues to adapt to the unique needs of all identities to mitigate existing barriers. The program’s data collection strategy will encourage a mindset where we think about accessibility and inclusiveness by default and will support an outcome where other activities and initiatives within the Science and Engineering Directorate adopt a GBA Plus mentality.

Program name: Force Generation

Program goals: The Officer Induction Model (OIM) is a comprehensive approach to recruiting, training and developing CBSA officers suited for service in an armed law-enforcement agency. The model comprises three components: the Officer Trainee Selection Process, the Officer Induction Training Program (OITP), and the Officer Induction Development (OID) Program.

Target population: All Canadians. Specifically, the Force Generation Program seeks to attract qualified Canadians and permanent residents who are interested in a career in law enforcement at the CBSA.

Distribution of benefits: All persons in Canada benefit from the activities carried out by the Force Generation Program, which are to recruit and train border services officers who uphold and administer over 90 different government acts and regulations.

From a GBA Plus perspective, the program is not intended to benefit one demographic group more than another. 

  Group
By gender Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes: The demographic groups directly impacted by the program include eligible Canadians and permanent residents who are interested in a career on the front line at the CBSA. While the CBSA is an equal opportunity employer and seeks to recruit and attract diverse candidates that reflect Canada’s population, it recognizes that certain demographic groups may face employment barriers.

The recruitment and development process imposes a number of costs on candidates (such as travel for interviews, assessments, etc.) in addition to specific physical requirements that are conditions of employment. Once a candidate is selected as a recruit, they participate in an 18-week training program where there is a minimal weekly stipend of $125. They are required to attend on-site training at the CBSA College, Main Campus located in Rigaud, Quebec for the duration of this program, housed on-site at the College. Once successful in the program, recruits are assigned to a pre-determined location, which may be different from their hometown.

Some of the program factors identified above may create barriers for numerous demographic groups, including Indigenous persons, Black people, racialized people, persons with disabilities (PWDs), 2SLGBTQI+ people, ethno-religious minorities, lower income people, unilingual individuals, lone parent households, etc.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: N/A

Key program impact statistics: In 2022 to 2023, the National Officer Recruitment Program (NORP) launched the 008 selection process, which ran from June 15, 2023, to July 13, 2023. In total, 17,770 applicants were screened-in using the automation feature embedded within the Government’s hiring system. Given the volume of candidates who apply to the Officer Trainee Development Process, the NORP only pulls a percentage of screened-in applicants to be assessed in the 8-stage assessment process.

The Force Generation Program collects employment equity data through the self-declaration process, which is a voluntary process used to understand the diversity of candidates. Data is currently limited to the four designated employment equity groups as per the Employment Equity Act. The four groups are: Women, Indigenous Persons, Visible Minorities, and PWDs.

This self-declaration process is led by the Public Service Commission, the body centrally responsible for recruitment and staffing programs within the Public Service. Self-identification data is collected once a candidate becomes an employee, and is collected voluntarily. The Treasury Board Secretariat’s Office of the Chief Human Resources Officer (OCHRO) is currently modernizing the self-identification process to enable a broader array of data collection in relation to religious affiliation and gender and sexual identities. These changes are expected to take place in October 2023, however data availability will be contingent on the stabilization of data collection at the Public Service level. In the interim, the CBSA uses the data that it collects through its current processes to assess and understand barriers.

Statistics Observed results Data source Comment
Number and percentage of Women who were pulled from the selection process and the success rate of being further screened-in

2,366 of 2,783 (85%)

women who applied were pulled for screening

Self-declaration data from process BSF23J-019776-000019

In 2022-23, 85% of female applicants were pulled. An additional 13.8% were pulled in 2023-24.

Those not pulled in 2022-23 were either ineligible at the time or had self-declared for statistical purposes only, and therefore would not have been eligible to be pulled for employment equity reasons as per the Employment Equity Act.

Number and percentage of PWDs who were further assessed for employment 404 of 457 (88%) PWDs who applied were pulled for screening Self-declaration data from process BSF23J-019776-000019

In 2022-23, 88% of applicants who self-declared as PWDs were pulled for further screening.

An additional 10% were pulled in 2023-24.

Those not pulled in 2022-23 were either ineligible at the time or had self-declared for statistical purposes only, and therefore would not have been eligible to be pulled for employment equity reasons as per the Employment Equity Act.

Number and percentage of Indigenous Persons who were further assessed for employment 255 of 284 (90%) Indigenous persons who applied were pulled for further screening Self-declaration data from process BSF23J-019776-000019

In 2022-23, 90% of applicants who self-declared as Indigenous Persons were pulled. An additional 9% were pulled in 2023-24.

Those not pulled in 2022-23 were either ineligible at the time or had self-declared for statistical purposes only, and therefore would not have been eligible to be pulled for employment equity reasons as per the Employment Equity Act.

Number and percentage of Visible Minorities who were further assessed for employment 2597 of 5699 (46%) Visible Minority applicants were pulled for further screening Self-declaration data from process BSF23J-019776-000019

In 2022-23, 46% of applicants who self-declared as visible minorities were pulled. An additional 16% were pulled in 2023-24. 

Given the volume of applicants from this group, prioritization is also based on other operational requirements.

Number and percentage of candidates who speak French as their first official language who were further assessed for employment 644 of 2010 (32%) applicants were pulled for further screening Candidate data from process BSF23J-019776-000019

In 2022-23, 32% of applicants who identified French as their first official language were pulled. An additional 15% were pulled in 2023-24.

Given the volume of applicants from this group, prioritization is also based on other operational requirements.

Number and percentage of people who speak English as their first official language who were further assessed for employment

4057 of 15,198

(27%)

Candidate data from process BSF23J-019776-000019

In 2022-23, 27% of applicants who identified English as their first official language were pulled. An additional 10% were pulled in 2023-24.

Given the volume of applicants from this group, prioritization is also based on other operational requirements.

Number and percentage of bilingual candidates who were further assessed for employment

1,608 of 4,619

(35%)

Candidate data from process BSF23J-019776-000019

These are candidates who indicated that they would like to undergo second language evaluations in order to hold a bilingual position.

In 2022-23, 35% of applicants who indicated an interest in holding a bilingual position were pulled. An additional 16% were pulled in 2023-24.

Given the volume of applicants from this group, prioritization is also based on other operational requirements.

Percentage of recruits who graduate by Employment Equity group

For cohorts graduating in 2022-23, on average:

31% of graduates self-declared as women

25% of graduates per cohort self-declared as visible minorities

2% of graduates self-declared as persons with disabilities

4% of graduates self-declared as Indigenous People

Candidate data from processes BSF16J-009219-000021; BSF17J-018236-0000012, BSF18J-019776-00005, BSF18J-019776-000009, BSF18J-019776-000010 & BSF23J-019776-000019  

Other key program impacts: The Force Generation Program has implemented a strategy entitled the National Officer Recruitment and Outreach Strategy and Action Plan (2022-2025) which strives to strengthen the diversity of its frontline workforce. The strategy specifically aims to reduce and eliminate barriers for recruitment and retention of qualified individuals within five demographic groups: Indigenous Peoples, Women, PWDs, 2SLGBTQI+ and bilingual persons. The strategy also considers intersectionality to ensure that efforts and processes do not result in unintended discrimination or disadvantage.

The key impacts of this work to date are summarized below:

Inclusive mindset: All employees who participate in the recruitment and training of officers are required to complete mandatory diversity and equity training, including Anti-Racism training, GBA Plus training, and Indigenous-related training. Notably, employees in this area indicated that they feel comfortable speaking up against racism in the workplace (80% positive response vs. 70% for the CBSA at large).

Inclusive hiring process: Equity, diversity and inclusion considerations are embedded throughout the process. The Agency has a diverse group of recruiters and interview board members. It has completed a review of the language used in the selection process to ensure that it is more inclusive, while also engaging with people from negatively impacted communities in the development of communications, recruitment initiatives, etc. This has resulted in more focused events and activities, including those geared toward recruitment in Indigenous communities, such as the Indigenous Candidate Mentorship (ICM) initiative which connects Indigenous candidates with an Indigenous mentor to provide ongoing support through the various stages of the process. Notably, the attrition rates of mentees in the ICM are lower than those of all Indigenous candidates, notably where other forms of attrition are concerned (i.e., this refers to candidates becoming inactive for reasons other than failure, such as withdrawals, no-responses, and no-shows for assessments). ICM mentees had an average other attrition rate of 8.8% at the interview stage compared to 23% across all Indigenous candidates (-14.2%); 2.5% at the psychological assessment stage compared to 7% for all Indigenous candidates (-4.5%); and 12.7% compared to 31% at the additional requirements stage (-18.3%).

Indigenous Recruitment: Acknowledging that Indigenous candidates may not have access to or be aware of the CBSA’s recruitment process, non-advertised processes can be used to accept Indigenous candidates throughout the year. In 2022-23, 82 Indigenous candidates were included through non-advertised means. This allows for the timely hiring and onboarding of key shortage groups at the CBSA. The CBSA is committed to respecting the unique position of Canada’s Indigenous People and their territory. As such, efforts are made to offer a candidate a port of entry near their community if there is a vacancy available in their language profile. 

Workforce Planning: The CBSA conducts detailed workforce planning, recognizing that the frontline workforce falls short on key designated employment equity groups, and prioritizes the hiring of qualified candidates within the four designated employment equity groups. The CBSA also considers employment equity goals when considering the preferences of candidates for placement at ports of entry across Canada.

Student Hiring: The CBSA has a robust student employment program to attract and recruit Student Border Services Officers (SBSOs). It works closely with the Federal Student Work Experience Program (FSWEP) to ensure that it attracts and recruits a diverse and talented pool of candidates. Notably, gender parity exists within the SBSO population, with 50% of SBSOs being women. It should be noted that SBSOs work in the region where they are recruited and have shorter training periods.

Community Partnerships and Engagement: Continuous research is conducted on intersectional organizations that can be partnered with to help identify barriers and mitigation strategies within the selection process for various identity groups (e.g., the Native Women’s Association of Canada, which is a national Indigenous organization representing the political voice of Indigenous women, girls and gender-diverse people in Canada).

Inclusive Workplace: An information package has been created for all candidates in the CBSA Officer Trainee selection process to provide valuable information, particularly on efforts to support various identity groups and accommodations throughout the assessment process. Beyond the recruitment process, the CBSA continues to explore and research different defensive equipment and tools to better meet the needs of diverse employees. This includes the introduction of light-weight equipment such as defensive batons to support officers and reduce the weight of equipment on duty belts. The Firearm Modernization Strategy will also seek to reduce barriers for employees as the CBSA seeks to reduce trigger pull weight and introduce optical sighting systems for more inclusive and accessible duty firearm platforms. 

Addressing recruit attrition: In an effort to address increasing recruit withdrawals, long-term leave and accommodation requests, significant progress in alignment has been made between the geographic distribution of recruit invitations and the regional seat allocation. This alignment is expected to reduce the number of training deferrals and withdrawals as it is generally accepted that the preference of candidates is to remain closer to their residence.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: In 2022 to 23, the CBSA implemented regular reporting on employment equity goals in relation to key CBSA strategies and initiatives. Reports are available on a quarterly basis and allow for adjustments and corrective actions should deficiencies be found. Additionally, weekly updates are provided to senior management on progress against gender parity and employment equity goals of recruits.

For every Officer Trainee process, the NORP tracks self-declaration data and measures the attrition rate of candidates against data provided during the eight assessment phases.

In addition, the Force Generation Program has started to collect and analyze data from candidate feedback surveys to better understand their experiences. This includes collecting information from Indigenous candidates through the Indigenous Candidate Form, as well as an Exit Survey for candidates who withdraw from the process. This data is not currently analyzed in a systematic manner, but rather on an ad-hoc basis. There are plans to review this process so that data can be analyzed more systematically.

Self-declaration is a voluntary process, hence data may not be accurate as not all candidates complete a self-declaration form. For the 008 selection process (BSF23J-019776-000019), 7,177 candidates self-declared (42%). Of those, 6,167 wished to have their self-declaration used for recruitment purposes and the other 1,010 wished to have it used for statistical purposes only. However, various steps are taken in an effort to increase the self-declaration rate, including:

  • During recruitment information sessions and throughout the selection process, the NORP encourages potential applicants and candidates to self-declare and request accommodations, if needed. Information is shared on the confidentiality of the data as well as the benefits of self-declaration.
  • Messaging on self-declaration is reiterated numerous times through ongoing communication with candidates. This also includes detailed definitions of what is considered a person with a disability.
  • The NORP’s quarterly newsletter, “The Candidate Column,” is distributed to increase communication with candidates and improve their experience. Recent iterations have included topics on the benefits of self-declaration, demystifying self-declaration for PWDs, and workplace accommodations. It also listed different types and examples of disabilities. A section on self-declaration is now embedded within every iteration of the newsletter.

To better report on program impacts on gender and diversity, and gain feedback on the barriers faced by various intersectional identities, the CBSA will do the following:

  • Conduct and analyze experiences from candidates and recruits who withdraw from the process.
    • September to December 2023: Review and update the candidate exit questionnaire with an inclusive lens.
    • January to March 2024: Implement the new questionnaire and train staff on how to use it.
  • Analyze attrition data of candidates on a quarterly basis to identify selection process stages where certain groups experienced higher levels of attrition than others, and implement steps to better support candidates, where possible.
  • Launch the modernized self-identification process to collect a broader array of information and data:
    • September 2023: Start communicating information to employees on the new self-identification process.
    • October 2023: OCHRO launches new centralized portal.
    • October to December 2023: Host information sessions for managers and employees to explain the value of self-identification in supporting program design and improvement.
    • January to April 2024: Analyze and report data provided by OCHRO.

In June 2023, the NORP launched an employment equity selection process specific to Windsor POEs, and will be collecting, analyzing and reporting on the impacts of the program on a quarterly basis.

Program Name: Intelligence Collection and Analysis

Program goals: The Intelligence Collection and Analysis Program (ICAP) collects, interprets and analyzes information and intelligence to produce border-related intelligence on people, goods and/or conveyances that may be inadmissible or pose a threat to the security of Canada, as well as on other border threats. Information is collected from surveillance activities, Confidential Human Sources (CHS), classified and open sources, as well as domestic and international partners, resulting in a range of intelligence products including lookouts, surveillance reports, threat assessments, and alerts. These support informed enforcement-related decisions and help the Agency prioritize risks, ultimately resulting in the mitigation of risks and threats to the safety, security, and prosperity of people living in Canada.

Target population: All Canadians can be recruited and/or volunteer as human sources within the ICAP.

Distribution of benefits: The ICAP contributes to making Canadian society safer and therefore benefits Canadians at large.

  Group
By gender Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes: All Canadians may benefit indirectly from the outcomes of the program as the overall goal is to provide intelligence in support of national security and public safety priorities, thus providing safer communities for all Canadians. The ICAP is actively working to apply GBA Plus to its CHS program.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: Not currently available. Although the ICAP collects information on a wide range of GBA Plus factors throughout the analysis and production of intelligence reports (such as age, sex, gender, ethnicity, and religion), the program’s impacts on gender and diversity are not known at the moment as the data has not been considered for this purpose. No GBA Plus results can be reported at this time.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: Collecting information from CHS is a key activity associated with intelligence production where we can better understand, shape and influence our program’s impacts on gender and diversity. As such, the ICAP has established a plan to apply GBA Plus to its CHS program. The program will look into identity factors included in the GBA Plus Framework to gain insight into the socio-demographic composition of CHS.

To do so, we will analyze data from the 2022 to 2023 fiscal year. The number of active CHS participants at any given time fluctuates, but for the purpose of this exercise, we will consider all CHS participants within that timeframe, active or not. This will provide us with a sufficient baseline sample.   

Identify how identity information collected on CHS participants can be securely expanded to include a wider range of factors to facilitate more in-depth GBA Plus analysis.
Timeline Planned action Goal
Q2 2023 to 2024 Identify CHS data sources

Reach out to program administrator and identify where the data on CHS participants is stored. Gain access to the data.

As data is being collected manually on classified systems, information collected in relation to the CHS program will be sanitized in order to provide high-level results in an unclassified manner.

Q3 2023 to 2024 Analyze current data points Analyze 2022-23 data to develop a baseline. 
Q4 2023 to 2024 Identify findings Following in-depth analysis, identify any gaps related to the available identity factors, applying an intersectional lens.

Q4 2023 to 2024

Expand data points, if possible
Develop plan to address gaps Identify options to improve the CHS program.
Q1 2024 to 2025 Take action on plan to address gaps Identify options to improve current practices and procedures.

Program name: Recourse

Program goals: The Recourse Program provides travellers and businesses with an accessible mechanism to seek impartial reviews of CBSA decisions and to voice any feedback or complaints, in accordance with legislation and policies administered by the Agency. Feedback from Recourse decisions on appeals and complaints results in improvements to CBSA services and program delivery.

The program is mandated by border-related legislation and, as such, when consulted on impacts that proposed legislative changes, initiatives or policies may have, the program conducts a GBA Plus analysis and provides input as appropriate.

Target population: Any persons or businesses who have had interactions with the CBSA and submit feedback (compliments, comments or complaints) or request a review of certain CBSA decisions or enforcement actions.

Distribution of benefits: Travellers and businesses that interact with the CBSA.

  Group
By gender Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes:  Any persons or businesses who have had interactions with the CBSA may submit feedback (compliments, comments or complaints) or request a review of certain CBSA decisions or enforcement actions. 

The Recourse Program is governed by the principles of transparency, accessibility, consistency, impartiality and timeliness. As such, the program strives to ensure that there are no barriers that exist in seeking redress. Border services legislation allows for a reasonable time to request a review, and there are no fees to request a review. In addition, guidelines are provided on the CBSA website on how to submit appeals or complaints. These are regularly reviewed to ensure they are as comprehensive and simple as possible and to avoid creating barriers for any group. Recourse accepts feedback and appeals electronically, but also by regular mail. Work is also being done to implement an e-portal for appeals to improve communication with clients who may not wish to use mail or email.

The CBSA also has the Border Information Service (BIS) telephone line, text to voice (TTY) line, plus multiple web and social media channels that CBSA clients can contact to request clarification of any program, including appeals, compliments and complaints.  

There are additional communication channels beyond Recourse that CBSA clients can use to provide feedback. For example, the Agency is working toward reducing, removing and preventing barriers for its employees and clients through its Accessibility Plan and Feedback Process. The CBSA’s Accessibility Office, through ongoing consultation and collaboration with the PWD community, has recently published its inaugural three-year plan and Accessibility Feedback Process. Feedback submitted on the plan or to report a barrier will be incorporated into future planning and implementation strategies. CBSA is committed to developing an equitable and accessible environment for all Canadians.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: N/A

Other key program impacts: As part of Recourse’s commitment to applying GBA Plus, the program has updated all its communication templates to ensure that all communication with clients is gender-neutral. Employees have also received training and guidance on ensuring that any non-templated communication with clients is respectful of the GBA Plus principles, using gender-inclusive language and avoiding gendered pronouns.

At the conclusion of ministerial reviews, litigation and complaints, formal feedback is provided to internal stakeholders. The feedback includes key messages to support the Agency in incorporating GBA Plus into its policies, programs and initiatives. The feedback is based on the findings of the review and may include suggestions for program improvements or identify service- or policy-related gaps. For example, at the outcome of a human rights complaint, Recourse provides qualitative feedback such as reminding personnel to be mindful when engaging in conversations with travellers and to ask questions in line with the performance of their duties during processing and examinations (e.g., it is not necessary to ask a traveller about their religious beliefs, unless there is a specific reason for the line of questioning). Recourse also provides the Agency with raw data and qualitative feedback that allows further analysis by program owners contributing to training and service delivery improvements, or to the identification of policy gaps where applicable. 

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: The Recourse mandate is to provide an accessible mechanism for travellers and businesses to seek impartial reviews of CBSA decisions or voice any feedback/complaints in accordance with legislation and policies administered by the Agency. To ensure that additional biases are not introduced at the redress stage, the program limits the collection of information to what is strictly necessary for the program to be administered, and does not require additional or specific data elements to be provided beyond what the client shares as part of their service request. The program collects data that clients choose to share as part of the appeals process or through their feedback/complaints to the Agency (e.g., race, gender, socio-economic status, etc.). Of note, the Traveller Facilitation and Compliance Program is establishing a GBA Plus Data Collection Plan that, once in place, could enable further GBA Plus analysis of Recourse outcomes, as required.

Following a complete and impartial review of Agency actions and decisions, as well as following complaint investigations, Recourse provides qualitative feedback to CBSA program owners and frontline operations. Case-specific analyses are conducted to identify gaps in policies, procedures or operational processes, which may highlight the need to update written polices that are not aligned with legislation or include reminders to be mindful of the questions posed to travellers and be sensitive to their needs. The information provided by clients, subject to information sharing practices, also contributes to the understanding of diverse client experiences at the border and allows for the Agency to adjust and mitigate impacts on diverse population groups. For example, monthly dashboards are provided to internal key stakeholders providing the number of service-related complaints received, the type of complaints received, and monthly trends. When travellers provide feedback to Recourse about their interactions with the CBSA, it offers valuable insights on areas for improvement. The scope of the feedback, which ultimately contributes to improving training and service delivery, will vary depending on the legislative framework of the case/proceedings. 

Recourse will continue to provide case-specific feedback that ultimately leads to legislatively sound enforcement, program decisions and compliance related to the enforcement of the laws administered by the CBSA.

Program name: Security Screening

Program goals: The CBSA conducts security screening activities for temporary resident, permanent resident and refugee claimants who are seeking to enter or remain in Canada. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) receives and performs an initial assessment of applications for temporary residence (TR) or permanent residence (PR) and refers applicants with potential inadmissibility concerns to the CBSA and/or Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) for in-depth security screening. These referrals are based on thematic risk indicators established by the CBSA and public safety partners. In addition, all adult refugee claimants who submit their claims at a CBSA or IRCC inland office in Canada, and whose claims are deemed eligible, are referred to the CBSA and CSIS for security screening. GBA Plus was applied as part of an evaluation of the Immigration National Security Screening (INSS) program in 2021, but a more detailed analysis is warranted. This will be applied to assist in further refining security screening indicators which, in turn, could result in greater program effectiveness (i.e., by focusing screening on applicants who are most likely to pose a security concern) and more equitable distribution of program impacts.

Target population: Foreign Nationals applying for temporary or permanent immigration status in Canada. By improving the immigration security screening process, the program aims to facilitate entry to Canada for persons that are admissible while ensuring that Canada remains a safe country for both Canadian citizens and foreign nationals residing in Canada on a temporary or permanent basis.

Distribution of benefits:

  Group
By gender Second group: 60 to 79 % men
By income level Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes:  The program benefits all Canadians by conducting a fair, effective and efficient immigration security screening process to ensure that Canada remains a safe country. It is aimed at the Canadian population as a whole and supports the broader values of Canadian society through bolstering public safety. In addition, the program impacts foreign nationals seeking to immigrate to Canada on a temporary or permanent basis. Notably, as all foreign nationals seeking to immigrate to Canada may be referred for security screening, they may be subject to barriers or processing delays should the thematic indicators be inaccurately interpreted or unnecessarily broad. An evaluation of the INSS program in 2022-23 showed that applicants who were male were most likely to be referred by IRCC for security screening.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: Not available. The program’s impacts on gender and diversity are not known at this time.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: The program is currently missing data on what GBA Plus identity factors are used to assess an applicant’s risk profile in terms of severity of concerns and how that impacts individuals with specific or intersecting identity factors in regard to gender and diversity. This data is needed to assess the alignment (or lack thereof) between applicants’ GBA Plus characteristics and their actual risk profiles, including the combination of different characteristics (e.g., country of origin, age and employment history). Such analysis could assist in further refining the security screening indicators, which, in turn, could result in greater program effectiveness (i.e., by focusing screening on applicants who are most likely to pose a security concern) and more equitable distribution of program impacts.

Taking into consideration intersecting identity characteristics for each applicant, such as cultural, regional and geopolitical factors, thematic indicator packages were created by the Centre for Immigration National Security Screening (CINSS) and Public Safety as a means to provide procedural guidance to IRCC officers on when to refer applicants to the CBSA and screening partners for further review. Although the parameters of the various thematic risk profiles are founded, the security screening process of risk assessment is subjective and could benefit from a comparative analysis of IRCC’s application data versus CINSS’s security screening data to assess the referral proportionality among various populations.

The security screening program is vulnerable to various layers of bias throughout the screening process which means it could benefit from a thorough analysis of the alignment between applicants’ GBA Plus characteristics and their actual risk profiles. The program will be assessed as follows:

  • 1) A review will be conducted on the thematic indicator packages that are provided to IRCC by assessing the level of concern of specific intersecting identity characteristics and comparing them against IRCC’s immigration application referral data to draw inferences on how the thematic indicators are utilized.
    • (a) October 2023: We will aim to coordinate with IRCC to extract data from their Global Case Management System (GCMS). There has not been communication with IRCC to review immigration application data in GCMS specifically at this time. 
    • (b) October to December 2023: Review of the data extract from GCMS will be conducted in order to compare the total number of immigration applications received against the percentage of cases that get referred for security screening. Further analysis will be performed to assess how thematic indicators are utilized between IRCC offices. This will enable the program to report on initial results in regard to key program impacts on gender and diversity in the following months.
  • 2) As part of the Security Screening Automation project, the CBSA will ensure that GBA Plus data collection capabilities are included in the development of the new case management system (Epsilon) which is replacing the current Secure Tracking System (STS). More specifically, this will assist in determining whether IRCC officers are following the guidelines in the thematic indicator packages and to make inferences of whether there are trends of officer bias impacting the type/amount of applications being referred for security screening.
    • (a) April to June 2025: As Epsilon is scheduled to be completed in March 2025, the data collection period will be set to run weekly for the duration of Q1 2025. This is to ensure ample opportunity to address any potential operational system anomalies for Epsilon so as to not impact the reliability of the data collected.
    • (b) June 2025: Data collected throughout Q1 2025 will be analyzed to identify any potential trends of officer bias impacting the type/amount of applications being referred for security screening.
    • (c) July 2025: Based on the data collected and analyzed in Q1 2025, thematic indicator package training for IRCC officers will be adjusted to increase or decrease application referral rates or to improve IRCC officer objectivity when assessing a file.
    • (d) July to September 2025: Testing the revised thematic indicator package training for IRCC officers and implementation.

Program name: Targeting

Program goals: The CBSA receives advance information from commercial air carriers to identify people for pre-arrival risk assessment purposes. The requirement for commercial air carriers to provide Advance Passenger Information (API) and all available Passenger Name Record (PNR) data, concerning all travellers (including crew) to the CBSA before a flight’s departure, comes from section 5(a)-(f) of the Passenger Information Customs Regulations (PICR) and section 269(1)(a)-(f) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations (IRPR). API and PNR data enables the CBSA to identify in advance people who may pose a risk to national security, or who may be involved in illicit migration or the smuggling of contraband. Domestic law and international agreements restrict Canada’s use of PNR data to preventing and detecting terrorism offences or serious transnational crime while limiting the impact on privacy, civil liberties and human rights.

The API/PNR data is automatically screened through pre-determined Scenario-Based Targeting (SBT) rules known as scenarios within the CBSA Passenger Information System (PAXIS). Scenarios are generated upon intelligence, emerging threats, and comparative enforcement analyses that are associated to terrorism offences or serious transnational crime including contraband or illicit migration.

When API/PNR is received by the CBSA, it is processed through all active scenarios. If the traveller’s information matches all criteria of a scenario, the traveller is placed on the “Scenario Work List” in PAXIS. Targeting Officers at the National Targeting Centre (NTC) will conduct comprehensive reviews on travellers who have matched scenarios in order to confirm or negate the potential risk. In addition to the scenario match, the traveller’s information is processed through a number of queries to various internal and external databases either automatically or manually, in order to provide supplemental information for use during the review by the Targeting Officer. If the risk is determined to be valid, a target will be issued which will enable the interception of the traveller for further processing upon arrival in Canada.

Target population: The program’s target population does not have any specific demographic characteristics related to GBA Plus identity factors.

Distribution of benefits: All Canadians benefit from scenario-based targeting by improving public safety for Canada as a whole. 

  Group
By gender Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes: All Canadians benefit indirectly from SBT as it ensures that high-risk individuals are being identified prior to arriving at the border. Travellers could experience negative impacts such as wait times and secondary examinations, should they be referred for an examination due to SBT.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: Not available. The program’s impacts on gender and diversity are not known at this time. While the SBT program considers certain GBA Plus identity factors, and there is some existing data, GBA Plus analysis has yet to be conducted. The program has recently increased its resources and attention toward GBA Plus and will now conduct an analysis on the existing data set and enhance it as needed, as per the plan with clear dates and actions below. As GBA Plus has yet to be applied to the SBT program, no results can be reported in relation to impacts on gender and diversity at this time.

Other key program impacts:

  • We are actively participating in the MAF Sprint exercise with the GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility. The MAF Sprint initiative aims at supporting programs to create and implement a GBA Plus data collection plan.
  • The NTC uses “they” instead of “he” or “she” in order to challenge gender-based assumptions when developing and reporting within SOPs, and other internal communications.
  • Written products use generic language when referring to an individual (e.g., “subject,” “associate,” etc.) and care is taken in written/oral communications to use proper spelling and pronunciation of foreign countries and cities.
  • SBT development procedures will include a challenge function that requires analysts to confirm that human rights and civil liberties are respected, and that GBA Plus considerations are applied.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: The program will collect data related to SBT development on an annual basis, looking into all available GBA Plus identity factors such as age and gender, and identify if there are trends in the data set. This will involve collecting data on all existing scenarios, of which there are generally between 300 to 400. The program is interested in applying a GBA Plus lens to these activities to ensure that controls are being respected and that biases toward certain GBA Plus identity factors are not being included in scenario development.

As mentioned above, the scenarios are created based on current intelligence, emerging threats, and comparative enforcement analyses; however, the Targeting program would like to ensure that GBA Plus identity factors (e.g., gender and age) that could be included in the criteria of a scenario are indeed required and that GBA Plus is being considered as often as possible. This activity will enable the program to measure its gender and diversity impacts as it works to ensure that high-risk individuals are identified prior to arriving at the border.

Timeline Planned action Goal
Q3 2023 to 2024 Identify data sources

Reach out to program administrator and identify where the data is stored. Gain access to data.

As data is being collected manually on classified systems, information collected in relation to the SBT program will be sanitized in order to provide high-level results.

Q4 2023 to 2024 Analyze current data points Identify the current demographic makeup of SBT scenarios for 2022 to 2023 to develop a baseline.
Q1 2024 to 2025 Identify findings Following in-depth analysis, identify any gaps related to the available identity factors, applying an intersectional lens.
2024 to 2025 Address gaps Continue creating researched and founded scenarios without the automatic reliance on GBA Plus identity factors.

Program name: Trade Facilitation and Compliance

Program goals: The program ensures that importers comply with revenue requirements and that duties and taxes owed to the Government of Canada are collected.

Target population: The trading community (i.e., Canadian importers) is the specific sector of the economy affected by the program.  

Distribution of benefits: The target population benefits from having the means to voluntarily comply with revenue requirements.

Specific demographic group outcomes: Canadian importers who must comply with trade rules. We will be able to provide more specifics after our GBA Plus survey and action plan are completed.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: Not available. The program is not able to measure its impact on gender and diversity for 2022-23.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: The program and the CBSA at large do not currently collect GBA Plus data on companies or individuals within a company that interact with this program. Although there may be data available on various companies and industry sectors in Statistics Canada, for example, this data does not sufficiently enable the program to measure impacts on gender and diversity. Additionally, the program cannot substantiate external sources of data to those companies or individuals that interact with the program. As a result, the program intends to begin collecting data in 2024-25 based on the following planned actions.

Planned actions:

TAPD will implement a GBA Plus data collection strategy. The strategy will enable TAPD to identify and address gaps related to gender and diversity (e.g., more education and promotion in specific demographics such as gender, ethnicity, culture, age, language and geographical areas where gaps have been identified). TAPD will invite 100% of regular program users and the spectrum of trade chain partners (particularly the 250+ licensed customs brokers) to participate in the data collection in the form of a survey. While this will be a voluntary method of participation, TAPD aims to base the analysis on a response rate of 56% (recommended to be a meaningful sample size by statistics and market research). The scope of the data collection will be developed in October 2023 as per the detailed action plan below. Once data has been received and analyzed, the results will enable TAPD to focus efforts to address previously undetected barriers to compliance.

The plan will focus efforts where TAPD programs engage with trade chain partners through service offerings. This TAPD implementation will be launched in 2023 to 2024 through the Trade Facilitation and Compliance Program, and may be applied in other TAPD programs where possible (e.g., Anti-dumping and Countervailing programs). The planned actions are:

  • 1. TAPD CARM team to update the CARM software requirements – October 2023.
    • a. Include the requirement to update the language in the CARM CCP in a future CARM release to consider GBA Plus considerations.
    • b. Include the requirement to support a potential survey and facilitate a data collection process through the CARM CCP in a future CARM release.
  • 2. Conduct an analysis to identify TAPD points of service – December 2023.
    • a. Identify points of service throughout TAPD programs.
    • b. Categorize interactions by company or individual:
      • i. Individual interactions may require customized demographic data;
      • ii. Company interactions may require customization to collect leadership, board, organizational considerations.
  • 3. Conduct a risk assessment of applicability and methodology of data collection for each program to mitigate a negative reaction from the public – January 2024.
    • a. There may be programs that require a level of neutrality and additional levels of sensitivity. The risk assessment will facilitate the categorization of engagement to:
      • i. Initial contact survey (e.g., “Tell us more about you”);
      • ii. Post-engagement survey (e.g., “How did we do to meet your needs?”; “Are there ways we can improve our communication with you?”);
      • iii. A voluntary survey at any point in time.
    • 4. Develop a stand-alone survey for the Trade Facilitation and Compliance Program – February 2024.
      • a. Consult with internal and external subject matter experts such as:
        • i. CBSA Communications Directorate
        • ii. Information, Science and Technology Branch
      • b. This survey may accompany existing materials at different points of service. The survey form may be offered during the interaction with a company or individual when appropriate. The potential points of service are:
        • i. All licence applications (e.g., warehouses; duty-free stores; brokers; Duties Relief program applications);
        • ii. As part of the payment process of the broker licensing fee;
        • iii. D-Memos;
        • iv. Advance Rulings;
        • v. Refund submission process;
        • vi. CARM portal registration/program enrollment.
    • 5. Develop survey data collection framework – February 2024.
      • a. Identify methods of survey collection, TAPD unit/resource responsible to receive and analyze surveys.
      • b. Consult:
        • i. Regional resources;
        • ii. GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility;
        • iii. Communications Directorate;
        • iv. Information, Science and Technology Branch;
        • v. Finance and Corporate Management Branch;
        • vi. Human Resources.
      • c. Analysis and approval by senior management.
    • 6. Survey review and consultations – February to March 2024.
      • a. Conduct a program-level review.
      • b. Consult external subject matter experts such as the Border Commercial Consultative Committee and other industry associations.
    • 7. Survey Implementation – May 2024.
      • a. Electronic dissemination (e.g., email correspondence).
      • b. Web-based resources (e.g., CBSA website).
    • 8. Share initial results of key impact analysis regarding areas of improvement as part of the Departmental Results Report supplementary information table – June 2024.
    • 9. Survey collection – June 2024 to June 2025.
    • 10. Survey analysis and report – September 2025.
    • 11. Senior management to review and approve the GBA Plus action plan – October 2025.

Program name: Traveller Facilitation and Compliance

Program goals: The Traveller Facilitation and Compliance (TFC) program supports the facilitation of travellers and goods and the protection of Canada’s population from border-related risks.

GBA Plus elements are applied to these goals through:

  • Increased mandatory training for frontline staff (i.e., bringing attention to and addressing unconscious bias)
  • Improving and adding tools to their toolbox (i.e., communication strategies) which result in staff having the knowledge and awareness they need to administer consistent program delivery to travellers of diverse backgrounds
  • Improving data availability and reporting through continual program consultations and system advancements (i.e., Data Strategy 2.0 and updating performance metrics through annual corporate reporting exercises)

In 2022 to 2023, work was done within the Travellers Branch GBA Plus working group to position CBSA staff to attain knowledge on dealing with and reporting instances of discrimination or mistreatment of travellers without fear of reprisal from their superiors. The residual effects of this work will not be immediately seen as it will take time for staff to use this information. The goals of this completed work will be:

  • To ensure this new knowledge creates a more inclusive and dialogue-oriented work environment, and results in consistent, respectful interactions with travellers of diverse backgrounds
  • To see indirect effects of this work through traveller complaints data that is pulled on an ad-hoc basis

Target population: All Canadians, permanent residents, and foreign nationals bound for Canada.

Distribution of benefits: All travellers

  Group
By gender Broadly gender-balanced
By income level No significant distributional impacts
By age group No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes: The group has no notable characteristics beyond stating that all populations travelling to Canada are processed in the same manner. This includes Canadians who enter Canada by right, permanent residents, and foreign nationals.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: The program does not measure its impact on gender and diversity at the moment, but through ongoing GBA Plus-related activities, it is aiming to address this by the end of 2024 to 2025.

Other key program impacts: To ensure consistent program delivery, the CBSA has undertaken a number of GBA Plus-related activities in 2022 to 2023, including:

  • Increasing GBA Plus mandatory training for officers on topics related to GBA Plus (i.e., intro to GBA Plus, applying tools and best practices, unconscious bias).
  • Enhancing data collection beyond gender, income level and age group (i.e., working to include more specific elements such as race, people with specific disabilities, etc. and apply these to existing or new performance measures).
  • Creating a follow-up survey directed at frontline staff to get a pulse on instances of discrimination and/or mistreatment of travellers. Outcomes identified that instances of discrimination and/or mistreatment are occurring, and staff are still hesitant in reporting some of these instances for fear of negative consequences for their careers.
  • Using the results from the follow-up survey to help inform an implementation plan to improve the dynamic between frontline staff and travellers, and staff and their superiors. This plan contains several deliverables for our Travellers, Strategic Policy and Human Resources branches, aims to improve communication between staff in relation to witnessing these instances, and will hopefully have a positive, residual effect on how officers interact with travellers at ports of entry.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: Work is underway on a series of tools, resources, processes and approaches that will contribute to the improvement of data collection, retention, management, and analysis to better support GBA Plus in the TFC program. By having more data available (such as having the ability to perform system queries on the various groups being referred to secondary), focus may be brought to potential unconscious biases and thereby allow the Agency to course-correct. The enhancement of data collection will also assist IT in adjusting current system algorithms, as well as creating new ones in the future to assist in processing population groups. Having more GBA Plus-related data will also assist the program areas in the development of new and meaningful performance metrics. The results of these new metrics can be used by programs to make adjustments to various policies/processes, which should have a direct positive effect on various population groups that present themselves at POEs.

Although the Agency can only readily query its systems for gender, age and income/socio-economic factors, it is currently looking at ways to link these three elements to a broader range of priorities over the next few years. These discussions will take place not only as part of annual performance management conversations with the Risks and Results team, but between the program areas and Chief Data Office (CDO) to ensure that our systems are capable of pulling the data that is needed. The TFC areas have begun discussions with CDO and will look to engage the Risks and Results team prior to the next Departmental Results Report exercise.

In terms of the consultations already underway with the CDO, the focus has been on how its Data Strategy 2.0 can help the TFC GBA Plus-related performance storyline. Through these ongoing consultations, the Agency will be able to ensure that its systems allow for and are able to pull the necessary data needed to improve its GBA Plus footprint in its reporting. This work is also important in identifying and addressing gaps related to gender and diversity data elements. CDO is working to include certain GBA Plus data elements in a pilot format. The chosen data elements will be announced following the analysis of the pilot results. The objective is that, through these pilots and continued consultations, the Agency’s systems will be well-positioned going forward to report on ethnicity, culture, language, and geographical areas. As next steps under the Data Strategy work:

  • Consult Travellers Branch (and others) to create a GBA Plus plan, including data and analytics – Summer 2023
  • Brief senior management on program plans, final results and recommendations – Fall 2023
  • Write a final report on the Data Strategy and direction and present to senior management and program areas. Following CDO’s final report, TFC will conduct analysis to measure program impacts on gender and diversity – July 2024

Within the Traveller Modernization project, the Digital Traveller Experience (DTE) sub-project will affect certain populations prior to arrival or upon arrival at a POE. The DTE will build on lessons learned from past projects and initiatives such as ArriveCAN and the Advance CBSA Declaration web and mobile application (app) tools, as the DTE will be accessed through a single mobile app as well. The data gained through surveys on previous apps showed that the Agency needs to improve the user friendliness and accessibility for all population groups (i.e., visually impaired, elderly, low economic regions without cellphone access/affordability, etc.). The DTE will involve a shift in policy that will impact IT-enabled business transformation projects including enhanced attention to GBA Plus. With this in mind, GBA Plus data elements and reporting will be discussed or considered as part of the following phases within this sub-project:

  • Phase 1: TB Submission seeking project approval - Expenditure Authority - Planning and Execution (Design Only) – by October 31, 2023
  • Phase 2: TB Submission seeking expenditure authority for Phase 1 - Execution and Phase 2 Planning – by September 30, 2024
  • Phase 3: TB Submission seeking expenditure authority for Phase 2 - Execution and Phase 3 Planning – by September 30, 2025
  • Phase 4: TB Submission seeking expenditure authority for Phase 3 - Execution and Phase 4 Planning – by September 30, 2026
  • TB Submission seeking expenditure authority for Phase 4 Execution – by September 30, 2027
  • Full implementation with all previous GBA Plus considerations accounted for – March 28, 2029

Another piece within Traveller Modernization that will have GBA Plus-related data collection implications is the Officer Experience – Traveller Compliance Indicator sub-project. This sub-project will be reinforced and supported by a dynamic, risk-based compliance model that leverages traveller data and predictive analytics to identify the risk level for all travellers entering Canada. It will be important to use the data generated from this sub-project to continually adjust and analyze system algorithms, with the goal of eliminating system bias. This sub-project consists of four phases and spans the same timeframe as the DTE. Many of these phases include analysis and discussions around all data implications (including GBA Plus), the first of which will be done in October 2023 as part of the Treasury Board Submission exercise.

Another area within TFC that is continually improving data collection and analysis is the dynamic between selective and random referrals to secondary. The Agency currently tracks this data, but is not only looking at trends in these referral types alone, but also at which population groups are being referred and why. The CBSA is continually looking at this data to ensure that bias reduced or eliminated, while using this analysis to ensure that policies, procedures and system algorithms are adjusted accordingly. This work is ongoing and will continue indefinitely.

Program name: Trusted Trader

Program goals: The goal of the Trusted Trader program is to facilitate trade and strengthen supply chain security by providing streamlined and efficient border processes to pre-approved, low-risk traders.

Target population: The target population of Trusted Trader programs is private sector industries and organizations across Canada involved in cross-border trade, including importers, exporters, carriers in all modes, couriers, customs brokers, warehouses, freight forwarders, and shipping agents. Specifically, they are traders who are members of, or are potentially interested in joining, a Trusted Trader program: Customs Self-Assessment (CSA) and/or Partners in Protection (PIP).

Distribution of benefits: The Canadian economy, and Canadian society at large, benefits from the Trusted Trader program, which ensures the supply chain is both secure and facilitated.

  Group
By gender  Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level  Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes: Businesses and organizations of different sizes, industry sectors or modes, and geographic locations.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: The program is currently unable to report on its key impacts on gender and diversity. At this time, the data collected by the program and the CBSA, and the analytical tools needed to evaluate this data, are not adequate to conduct GBA Plus.

Other key program impacts: In collaboration with the GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility, the program will ensure that its guidelines and training for Senior Trusted Trader Officers meet inclusivity and equity objectives. Specifically, Standard Operating Procedures and training modules will be updated to provide guidance on how to assist members when non-compliance is uncovered, from a GBA Plus perspective.

All employees have undertaken training on unconscious bias to foster more positive relationships with clients and stakeholders from various demographic groups. This training focused more specifically on bias related to ethnicity and race, in collaboration with the Canadian Anti-Racism Network.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: We will look at the following three identity factors: geography, ethnicity and gender. We will start by exploring and understanding these factors to see whether they represent barriers created by our business processes. We will do so by undertaking a qualitative study using focus groups made up of various program stakeholders. The insights gained from this process will inform a subsequent quantitative study that will be done using data from other sources. This will require us to clean up our data, create new reports and processes, and develop a new usable Excel database.

Collecting the data gained from the qualitative study will enable us to verify the following assumptions: whether companies located in remote areas or certain geographic locations experience challenges in staying compliant with program requirements; whether businesses that are women-owned or predominantly made up of visible minorities face barriers in staying compliant with program requirements; and whether business size or industry sector plays a role. These assumptions will then be validated through a quantitative analysis.

Using this information, the program will be in a position to measure its impact on diversity. In the future, this will enable the program to do targeted outreach, and offer enhanced client service and support, to help these businesses stay compliant with CBSA requirements, legislation and regulations, which is a central part of the program’s activities.

Planned actions:

  • September to November 2023: The Trusted Trader Programs Division will extract and clean up (where applicable) data from the TTMS and CBSA records, including geographic location, business size and mode, compliance Action Plans, CSA Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs), and membership suspension or cancellation decisions.
  • November 2023 to February 2024: Set-up and hold a focus group with select program stakeholders (develop an interview guide, select participants, conduct interviews, analyze the results) and create a usable database.
  • March to April 2024: Conduct a quantitative analysis of disaggregated data to identify any trends, patterns or disparities associated with Agency compliance actions taken by the Trusted Trader program.
  • May to June 2024: Write and present a report on findings regarding program impacts on gender and diversity, including recommendations for immediate or future remedies and analysis of any impacts of program requirements directly related to GBA Plus.

Program name: Trusted Traveller

Program goals: The Trusted Traveller program seeks to simplify and expedite the border clearance process for pre-approved, low-risk travellers entering Canada.

Target population: Pre-approved, low-risk travellers who meet program eligibility criteria.

Distribution of benefits: The Canadian society at large benefits from the Trusted Traveller program, which supports the facilitation of travellers and goods and the protection of Canada’s population from border-related risks.

  Group
By gender Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes: The group has no notable characteristics beyond those of the Canadian population travelling to Canada.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: The program is currently unable to report on its key impacts on gender and diversity. At this time, the program is unable to analyze data; however, it will be able to report on key program impacts on gender and diversity in 2023 to 2024 as per the GBA Plus Data Collection Plan below.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: On an ongoing basis, members and applicants to Trusted Traveller Programs (TTPs) submit their information to the CBSA for the purpose of the administration of the programs. Currently, there are approximately 1,750,000 active members across the TTPs. The CBSA is in the process of extracting GBA Plus data elements, including gender, date of birth, preferred language, postal/zip code, and citizenship or permanent resident status, from the records of active program members in its membership databases. In accordance with CBSA policy governing the extraction of data from its systems, the use of this data and related security controls must be assessed by the Departmental Security Officer (DSO) and the Information Security, Access to Information and Chief Privacy Office (ISATICPO) before this information is available for analysis. This data will be used to analyze the impact that gender, age, language, geographic characteristics, and citizenship may have on access to the TTPs, which will inform program delivery as well as the development and delivery of tools and products for outreach and stakeholder engagement. Through the analysis of this data, the program will be able to identify barriers experienced by certain socio-demographic groups when accessing the TTPs. Through the membership base of the TTPs, the program will enable the efficient allocation of CBSA resources on persons of high or unknown risk while facilitating the entry of pre-approved, low-risk travellers.

Planned actions:

  • August to September 2023: The use of membership data for GBA Plus analysis and the security controls to be implemented will be assessed by the DSO and ISATICPO. The program will extract and clean up (where applicable) the raw data set from the membership databases.
  • October to November 2023: Once the data has been cleaned, the program will conduct a quantitative analysis of disaggregated data to identify any trends and patterns across the TTPs.
  • December 2023 to January 2024: Present results of the impact analysis on gender and diversity to senior management and discuss next steps.
  • February to April 2024: Identify any gaps and create an action plan to address them. Establish a process to extract the relevant data from the membership databases in support of regular and ongoing GBA Plus analysis.
  • May to June 2024: Report on key program impacts on gender and diversity in the GBA Plus supplementary information table as part of the next Departmental Results Report.

Core responsibility: Border Enforcement

Program name: Criminal Investigations

Program goals: The mandate of the Criminal Investigations Program (CIP) is to support the CBSA’s public safety and economic prosperity objectives by investigating and pursuing prosecution of those who commit criminal offences against Canada's border legislation, including the Customs Act, the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), and other CBSA program legislation. Within the CBSA enforcement continuum, the CIP addresses the most serious contraventions and willful violations of border legislation that warrant criminal prosecution.

Target population: The target population of the CIP is all entities (including individuals and businesses) that may be involved in the commission of serious offences against the Customs Act, the IRPA, and other program legislation, as well as the witnesses, and in some cases the victims, of those offences. The individuals targeted by CIP activities represent various socio-demographic variables (age, gender, education, employment status, income, social class, urbanization level of residence) and have various GBA Plus identity factors. While the vast majority of the target population consists of entities in Canada, due to the international nature of the CBSA’s criminal investigations, some entities listed in the cases may be outside of Canada.

Distribution of benefits: As the CIP seeks to enforce Canada’s border legislation in order to uphold the integrity of Canada’s customs and immigration programs, and ensure public safety and economic prosperity in Canada, the program’s activities have an impact on all Canadians.

Specific demographic group outcomes: There is a wide range of socio-demographic groups that may be impacted in a wide range of ways by the program’s activities, including but not limited to:

  • Individuals/businesses that are the subject of investigations/prosecutions in relation to commercial trade fraud activities (e.g., evasion of customs duties)
  • Individuals/businesses involved in legitimate trade activities, who have an interest in CBSA enforcement to maintain a level playing field
  • All persons in Canada, who have an interest in ensuring the proper administration of applicable customs duties/controls on imports and exports
  • Individuals/businesses that are the subject of investigations/prosecutions in relation to the smuggling of contraband, namely firearms, prohibited weapons and prohibited devices
  • Actual or potential victims of violent crimes committed with smuggled firearms, prohibited weapons or prohibited devices
  • All persons in Canada, who have an interest in ensuring public safety through the administration and enforcement of prohibitions on the importation of contraband
  • Individuals/businesses that are the subject of investigations/prosecutions in relation to organized immigration fraud schemes and fraudulent immigration consulting activities, including in relation to the Temporary Foreign Worker (TFW) Program, human smuggling and/or human trafficking
  • Individuals that are the beneficiaries and/or victims of immigration fraud schemes or fraudulent immigration consulting activities (including TFWs), human smuggling activities, and/or human trafficking activities
  • Immigrants (including TFWs) and the general public, who have an interest in maintaining the integrity of a fair and transparent immigration system that promotes safe and orderly migration of individuals into Canada
  • The families of individuals (including TFWs) who are impacted by CBSA criminal investigations

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: The program’s impacts have not been identified at this time; however, the development of a CIP GBA Plus data strategy is underway through a pilot project in concert with the GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility and the CDO. The pilot project and subsequent data collection plan will aim to identify the relevant data elements that are entered in the CBSA Criminal Investigations Information Management System (CIIMS). A review of applicable qualitative and subjective data elements will be done to determine what impacts the CIP may have on TFWs who are listed as entities in the program’s criminal investigations. The data will be analyzed and then form part of a CIP GBA Plus data pilot project report, which is planned to be completed in Q3 2023-24.

Key program impact statistics: Statistics are unavailable at this time, as the CIP’s GBA Plus data pilot project is underway and the data collection plan is being developed.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: Publicly-available documents identify TFWs as a vulnerable population. The vulnerability of TFWs and other migrant workers has also been identified in CBSA intelligence reports.

As indicated above, CBSA Criminal Investigators conduct investigations into fraud related to the TFW Program. The targets of these investigations under the IRPA are not the workers themselves, but rather the organizers and employers who commit fraud using the TFW Program. Nevertheless, TFWs would be directly and indirectly impacted by the CBSA’s criminal investigations into IRPA fraud related to the TFW Program. These investigations seem to reveal patterns related to people of different genders and different citizenship or ethnic backgrounds doing different types of work (e.g., agricultural work, cleaning services work, etc.), in different regions (e.g., Prairies vs. Southern Ontario), and in different settings (e.g., rural vs. urban).

Through these investigations, criminal investigators come into contact with TFWs, who are often identified as actual or potential witnesses in criminal proceedings. These TFWs may also be identified as actual or potential victims of exploitation, and may therefore have an opportunity to participate in criminal proceedings, including by presenting a Victim Impact Statement (VIS).

As per CBSA policy in Part 9, Chapter 7 of the Enforcement Manual, the CI Program must ensure that the rights conferred to victims by the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights (CVBR) are fulfilled during a CBSA-led criminal investigation into an offence under the IRPA. Where applicable, these TFWs may also be informed of the possibility of applying to IRCC to obtain a Temporary Resident Permit for victims of human trafficking.

The gender, age and citizenship of TFWs may vary depending on the type of work performed, the location and the setting. The CIP assesses that there is reliable citizenship and age data, and some data on perceived gender, available in the CIP’s data holding related to TFW Program fraud cases, along with publicly-available information, to support an analysis of the program’s impact on different TFW communities. Focusing a GBA Plus activity on TFWs therefore presents the best opportunity to conduct a fulsome analysis of the CIP’s impact on GBA Plus communities. Not only does it provide multiple potential avenues for analysis, but it is an area where the CIP is most likely to have relevant and reliable data on GBA Plus identity factors.

In other words, the CIP is focusing its GBA Plus on a specific vulnerable demographic group as a target population, namely TFWs that are listed as entities (e.g., witnesses, victims) in the program’s criminal investigation cases, which is an area that is most likely to allow the program to produce a meaningful analysis. This analysis may include examining:

  • Whether and how the CBSA’s criminal investigations into TFW fraud may have a specific and/or general deterrent impact on crime, and how this deterrence may benefit individuals with different identity factors
  • Whether and how the application of the CVBR and the use of VIS in the CBSA’s TFW investigations may impact individuals with different identity factors
  • Whether the CBSA could take additional measures to ensure the protection of TFWs in the context of its criminal investigations into TFW fraud and, by extension, better ensure the protection of vulnerable individuals with different identity factors

The CIP sources of citizenship and other data may include:

  • Client identity documents verified by investigators or other CBSA officers
  • Information collected from investigators through interviews
  • Information collected from other sources (government databases, information from partners, etc.)
  • Forms completed by the investigator with help from the client (fingerprint forms, bail information sheets for court, etc.)


The CIP is focusing on TFW impacts as a first step to identify program impacts on gender and diversity. The program will build its GBA Plus capacity and data literacy with this first initiative. Based on those findings, the program will design a larger GBA Plus data strategy to measure its impacts on gender and diversity.

As part of the GBA Plus data pilot project, since January 2023, the CIP has been working with the GBA Plus Centre of Responsibility and the CDO to establish a data analysis strategy, using the available information pertaining to TFWs listed in CBSA criminal investigation files, along with publicly-available information on TFWs. An analysis of relevant investigation/prosecution cases relating to TFWs will be completed, including:

July to October 2023:

  • Review over 10 years worth of immigration fraud prosecutions dealing with TFWs that are recorded in CIIMS.
  • Detail each applicable element of the cases and note pertinent information while paying particular attention to GBA Plus data elements. Some of the elements to be examined will focus on the geographical area where these incidents took place, what type of work was performed, whether violence was reported in the progression of the alleged offences, and will include particular personal details about each foreign worker identified in the cases. Personal details may include their gender, nationality, proximity to economically vulnerable situations, and whether they were victimized or not.

November 2023 to February 2024:

  • Make a decision to potentially extend the number of cases being studied for the pilot project (i.e., beyond 10 years), should the initial sample size be insufficient to conduct a fulsome analysis.
  • Conduct additional analysis as required.

February to April 2024:

  • Prepare a report on findings and determine if the results of this analysis show that the CBSA’s criminal investigations into fraud related to the TFW Program have an impact on GBA Plus communities and/or vulnerable foreign workers.
  • Following the initial analysis, additional CBSA data may be sought to determine the extent of our program’s impacts on vulnerable TFWs. If data inadequacies are found, the CIP would determine if changes to existing systems could be implemented and if newer case management software would adequately capture data allowing the CIP to measure its effects on gender and diversity.

April to May 2024:

  • Present report to senior management.
  • Identity next steps to continue developing a GBA Plus data collection plan that will enable the program to measure its impacts on gender and diversity.

Program name: Detentions

Program goals:The program manages the care and control of immigration detainees, and administers an Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program that provides release options enabling the Agency to achieve balanced enforcement outcomes while effectively managing the needs of individuals released into the community. Persons under detention and/or ATD experience varying restrictions to their freedoms in balance with the need to protect the public and/or meet obligations under the IRPA. Applying GBA Plus to the program has enabled it to adapt the way it delivers its services to people with different identity factors, including intersecting factors.

Target population: Permanent Residents and Foreign Nationals in Canada who are subject to arrest and/or detention under the IRPA.

Distribution of benefits: All persons in Canada benefit from the activities of the Detentions Program, which are to carry out the mandate of the IRPA and protect public safety. 

No GBA Plus identity factors are intended to benefit more than any other(s).

  Group
By gender Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level  Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes: The demographic groups directly impacted by the program include women, men, 2SLGBTQI+ persons, Black or other racialized/visible minority communities, persons with disabilities, children or youth, seniors, newcomers or immigrants, individuals of particular socio-economic status, and individuals of particular familial characteristics. These groups are negatively impacted by detention socially, psychologically, and economically, but may benefit from support resources provided through the Community Case Management and Supervision (CCMS) program, which is an option provided within the ATD program. 

CCMS provides individuals who lack access to services and resources in Canada with support in the community through ongoing case management and service delivery.  Release plans are tailored according to individuals’ needs taking into account their identity factors, with the goal of effectively managing risk and facilitating compliance with the immigration enforcement continuum to case resolution or removal. Resources available through CCMS include housing, addiction, mental health, and medical supports which have all been found to be critical in stabilizing individuals of various backgrounds in the community.

Groups that may face barriers to accessing the CCMS program include women, 2SLGBTQI+ individuals, families, and persons with mental health issues, based on ongoing efforts to procure services for the CCMS program.  

Key program impacts on gender and diversity:

Key program impact statistics:

Statistics Observed Results Data Source
Number and percentage of minors detained 3 minors;
0.06% of all detentions
CBSA Detention Statistics
Number and percentage of minors housed (accompanying parent(s) being held in an Immigration Holding Centre) 30 minors;
0.6% of all detentions
CBSA Detention Statistics
Detention population based on gender
  • 84.58% male;
  • 15.38% female;
  • 0.04% other or unknown gender
National Case Management System
Availability of residential supports in the CCMS program based on gender and family status 95% male;
2.5% female only; 2.5% female, family, or other gender
Community Case Management and Supervision Contracts

Notes:

In 2022-23, the program continued its efforts to reduce the number of minors in detention.

The National Directive for the Housing and Detention of Minors, with its focus on ensuring the best interest of the child as the principal objective, was incorporated into the program’s main policy document, CBSA Enforcement Manual (ENF) Chapter 20.

The number of minors detained decreased from 4 in 2021-22 to 3 in 2022-23 despite a 58% increase in the number of persons detained over the same period.

The program will increase capacity to provide residential support by 20% for 2023-24, with 30% of this capacity reserved for females, families and those with other gender identities.

Additional data is required to determine if a gender-based resourcing model is appropriate for the program.

Statistics Observed Results Data Source
Top five source countries for detention
  • Mexico;
  • India;
  • Romania;
  • USA;
  • Nigeria
National Case Management System

Notes:

The program examined how well CCMS supported individuals with intersecting identity factors. Since the expansion of the CCMS program in 2018, the CBSA’s approach to supporting diverse populations was to find services as needed.  However, it was determined that a more intentional approach was required when it was noted that in the Greater Toronto Area region, individuals from a particular ethnolinguistic group with high immigration detention rates required additional supports to remain stable in the community and avoid re-arrest. As a result, in 2022-23, the CCMS program began working with a community organization that specifically supports this ethnolinguistic group.  Additional wellness services that address substance use and addictions are now being provided by the community organization since May 2023, and these services will be monitored for effectiveness in the coming months.

The program is continuing efforts to determine whether available resources within the CCMS program are sufficient to meet the needs of the affected population.

Other key program impacts: The program has incorporated considerations for gender and sexual identity in its policies, acknowledging that these factors could exacerbate detention. In 2022 to 2023, ENF Chapter 20 was updated to include these groups in the vulnerability category, which requires greater diligence when assessing needs and providing care.

Similarly, another policy update to ENF Chapter 20 in 2022 to 2023 requires that individuals with potential atypical abilities due to mental health concerns are considered for the CCMS program on an expedited timeframe.

To further address the needs of the diverse immigration population, new CCMS contracts in effect for 2024 to 2025 now require that service providers have access to appropriate resources for the 2SLGBTQI+ community, and that they refer individuals to culturally appropriate resources where available. 

Supplementary information sources: CBSA detention statistics

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: The GBA Plus analysis and plan found here is designed to help to inform decisions on the procurement and distribution of resources that will improve the needs of diverse groups of immigration detainees, as well as individuals released into the community with the goal of reducing time spent in detention and improving outcomes while in the community. The program area is continuing work to determine whether the CCMS program effectively offers diverse communities adequate access and use of the program as an alternative to detention. 

Currently, the CBSA collects data on the gender of individuals who are subject to immigration enforcement, including detention. It also collects data on the length of time in detention, and whether individuals have been referred for CCMS programming. The CBSA stores biographical information on the National Case Management System (NCMS) and GCMS. Data on CCMS referrals is stored in NCMS. The data is collected when individuals are placed under arrest or detention and form BSF561 is completed (Notice of Arrest and/or Detention under section 55 of the IRPA). 

Regionally, some Community Liaison Officers collect data on the individuals who are assessed for release onto CCMS, and the decision and reasons for referral or lack of referral.

Data gaps:

  • To better assess the impact of the CCMS’ contributions to diverse groups, data is needed regarding the decision on whether to refer a case to the program. This information is inconsistently recorded on the CCMS Referral form, a form used when referring individuals to the CCMS program; and may be communicated in detention reviews before the Immigration Division (ID) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Board (IRB). In some cases, local offices maintain a database on the cases that are assessed for referral into the CCMS program. As a result, data either does not exist or is unreliable at the programmatic level.
  • The Agency does not capture data related to several key GBA Plus considerations, including race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, and income. Using the data noted in the table above, we will make data-informed inferences concerning race, religion, ethnicity and geography, where possible.

The following data collection plan addresses the lack of available data required for an analysis of adequacy of access for diverse groups:

Q2 to Q3 2023 to 2024: Data analysis on the reasons for a lack of referral to CCMS programming.

Q3 to Q4 2023 to 2024:

  • Review the current case management systems (NCMS, GCMS, and regional databases) to determine if information about the reasons for a referral or a lack of referral to CCMS can be captured.
  • If the NCMS can collect the data, design an information sheet to distribute to the regions on how to collect the data on referrals. If it is not possible to collect the data in any of the national case management systems, design a spreadsheet to collect information on the reasons for a referral or a lack of referral to CCMS programming.
  • Implement the requirement for regions to complete the CCMS referral spreadsheet or enter information into the NCMS for each person being considered for referral to the CCMS program.

Q4 2023 to 2024 to Q2 2024 to 2025: Data collection period. Data for each assessed case and reasons for a referral decision will be input either into NCMS or the CCMS referral spreadsheet.

Q3 to Q4 2024 to 2025: Design and implement program changes based on the data analysis.

Program name: Hearings

Program goals: The Hearings Program represents the Minister of Public Safety and/or the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada at hearings before the IRB to ensure the safety and security of Canada and Canadians as well as the integrity of Canada’s immigration program, including the in-Canada asylum system (iCAS). Last year, the program engaged in GBA Plus training and planning.

Target population: A particular demographic group (foreign nationals and permanent residents) may be targeted by the Hearings Program if they are seeking to enter Canada, may be inadmissible to Canada, detained under IRPA, or are seeking to access the iCAS. 

The program’s efforts before the four divisions of the IRB target permanent residents or foreign nationals (this could include persons with any GBA Plus identity factors—nothing specific is targeted in terms of GBA Plus identity factors), as the case may be, who have:

  • 1. appealed to the IRB’s Immigration Appeal Division (IAD):
    • (i) a decision on a sponsorship application,
    • (ii) a removal order, or
    • (iii) a decision that they have failed to meet their residency obligation;
  • 2. been detained under the IRPA and have a detention review scheduled by the IRB’s Immigration Division (ID);
  • 3. been referred to the ID for an admissibility hearing;
  • 4. had a decision by the ID on their admissibility that may warrant an appeal to the IAD by the Minister;
  • 5. been referred to the IRB’s Refugee Protection Division (RPD) for a refugee hearing;
  • 6. appealed to the IRB’s Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) a decision by the IRB’s RPD;
  • 7. had a decision rendered by the IRB’s RPD that may warrant an appeal by the Minister to the IRB’s RAD; and
  • 8. come to the Hearings program’s attention as warranting consideration into whether to bring an application by the Minister to the IRB’s RPD to:
    • ((i) cease their refugee status, or
    • (ii) vacate their refugee status.

Distribution of benefits: All persons in Canada benefit from the program’s role in proceedings before the IRB through its contribution to the safety and security of Canada and Canadians, and the integrity of the immigration program, including the iCAS. 

The benefit is for all persons in Canada (whether they are Canadian citizens, foreign nationals, or permanent residents). No persons with particular GBA Plus identity factors are intended to benefit more than any others.

  Group
By gender  Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level  Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes: The program’s responsibility to represent the Ministers before the IRB has the potential to impact persons with any GBA Plus identity factors. At this point in time, the program has not identified any outcomes producing disproportionate outcomes for specific demographic groups. This will be accomplished once the data collection plan has been implemented.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: Not yet available. The program has created a GBA Plus Data Collection Plan (see below) outlining specific assessment criteria and goals with dates on when it will collect and report.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: The Hearings Program has identified two of its activities to be analyzed for GBA Plus:

(1) Ministerial triage for refugee claims that have been referred to the IRB’s RPD

Ministerial triage is an activity wherein a preliminary screening of all refugee claimant files are completed to determine whether further Ministerial consideration is warranted.

(2) Ministerial intervention in refugee proceedings before the IRB’s RPD

Ministerial intervention is an activity wherein a final determination is made by a Minister’s representative whether to participate in the refugee claim proceeding.

Refugee claimants (including individuals with any GBA Plus identity factors) are directly impacted by Ministerial triage and Ministerial intervention. 

When the Hearings Program participates in a proceeding before the IRB’s RPD, the proceeding becomes adversarial. Given the presence of an interest by one or both of the Ministers and the requirement that the Minister present credible and trustworthy evidence, there is an expectation that at least 70% of interventions will result in the claim being refused.

The program is interested in learning whether any groups with particular identity factors or combination of identity factors are impacted disproportionately by Ministerial triage and/or Ministerial intervention. Identifying disproportionate impact is the first step in a GBA Plus analysis that could lead to uncovering systemic bias.

The program will be looking at disaggregated data (available within our case tracking systems) on the following identity factors:

Sex/Gender
This information is collected as a ternary element (female, male, X). Any other forms of gender expression are not currently captured in the data.
Citizenship
There may be multiple citizenships for any given individual.
Country of birth
This information can be an indicator of racial or ethnic background.
Language (mother tongue):
This information can be an indicator of cultural background if the language spoken is not the majority language in their country of origin.
Age
This information can be calculated based on the client’s date of birth.

For example: Are there any demographic groups (such as those based on sex/gender, age, citizenship, country of birth) that CBSA triage offices tend to refer to CBSA Hearings or IRCC Reviews and Interventions (R&I) for Ministerial intervention more than others? Are there any demographic groups for which CBSA Hearings tends to intervene more than others?

Based on the conclusion of the analysis of the collected disaggregate data, the program will determine whether there are any groups with specific identity factors (as above) that are disproportionately impacted by Ministerial triage or Ministerial intervention. This will inform the program of potential systemic biases, underlying assumptions, or barriers that individuals with these specific identity factors might be facing.

The scope of the program’s GBA Plus Data Collection Plan is focused on two activities (Ministerial triage and Ministerial intervention) pertaining to hearings before the IRB’s RPD. The goal for these activities is to ensure that refugee claimants who are undeserving of refugee protection are not granted such status by the RPD. Through our analysis of potential impacts to diverse groups, we wish to collect data to ensure those seeking refugee protection do not experience differential treatment due to systemic bias, unfair assumptions, or barriers due to a person’s intersectional identity factors.

Data will be collected from GCMS and/or NCMS to help identify whether there are any patterns or trends in triage referral rates and intervention rates associated with refugee claimants with the identity factors (as above). Data will be pulled from previous fiscal years producing a report for each fiscal year. This will be followed by an additional report that analyzes historical trends spanning all fiscal years pulled.

Planned actions:

  • August 2023: Determine how the disaggregated data can be pulled from the system to populate a spreadsheet
  • September 2023: Pull the disaggregated data from the systems and populate in a single Excel spreadsheet where it will be possible to group various combinations of identity factors for future analysis
  • September 2023: Quality assurance on the data (e.g., to ensure there are no duplicate entries)
  • September to October 2023: Look at preliminary results and analyze specific identify factors and combinations of identity factors. This process includes applying filters to the collected data in order to group it based on various combinations of intersectionality and then create a visual aid to assist in comparing the resulting data sets
  • November 2023 to January 2024: Analyze the data to determine whether there are any historical trends in terms of triage closure/referral rates and/or intervention closure/filing rates and/or Minister’s success rates related to the Hearings Program
  • January to June 2024: If any statistically significant trends are identified, prepare a report detailing the patterns and trends

This data collection plan will ultimately lead to a deeper dive in an attempt to uncover whether there is systemic bias, unfair assumptions, or barriers causing disproportionate treatment due to a person’s intersectional identity factors.

Program name: Immigration Investigations

Program goals: Immigration Investigations Program activities and outputs support a broader, national program that governs policies related to the identification of inadmissible persons. The program investigates and reports, and, if appropriate, arrests and detains foreign nationals in Canada who are or may be inadmissible to Canada as defined by the IRPA. These activities and outputs assist the CBSA to meet its mandate and ultimately ensure the safety and security of Canadians and protect the integrity of the immigration and refugee system.

By taking an intersectional approach in reviewing existing resources, the program recognized the potential for bias in the language or approaches used, and began updating guidance resources such as the CBSA Enforcement Manuals (ENF) and Operational Bulletins (OB). By applying a GBA Plus lens, the program aims to ensure that its activities respect the use of gender-inclusive language throughout client interactions, including in official written documentation.

The program will continue to promote internal GBA Plus training products within its workforce.

Target population: Foreign nationals in Canada who are or may be inadmissible to Canada as defined under section(s) 34 to 42 of the IRPA.

Distribution of benefits: All persons in Canada benefit from the role the Immigration Investigations Program plays under the Public Safety portfolio, which was created to protect Canadians and maintain a safe and peaceful society. As such, the program is designed to ultimately benefit all Canadians by ensuring their safety and security, and protecting the integrity of the immigration and refugee system.

  Group
By gender  Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level  Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

 

Specific demographic group outcomes: At this point in time, the program has not identified any outcomes producing disproportionate outcomes for specific demographic groups. There are a number of factors that may contribute to a person’s inadmissibility to Canada; however, without extraction and analysis of the existing data, it is difficult to provide further information as to what extent persons with GBA Plus identity factors are impacted. This will be analyzed once the data collection plan has been implemented.

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: The program is sensitive to the needs of diverse communities and has developed guidelines with respect to treating diverse groups with sensitivity, privacy, and gender-inclusive language to avoid trauma and respect dignity. These guidelines have been disseminated agency-wide during the current reporting period; however, key impacts are unknown at this time. There is a need to seek disaggregated data to explore whether inequalities exist, and to further identify any intersectionality elements which may impact gender and diversity within the program activities. This will be addressed in the GBA Plus data collection plan below.

Other key program impacts: Although the program is not positioned to report net program impacts during the current reporting period, there have been substantial efforts made to make changes in program guidance, intended to positively impact the outcomes of the program’s delivery in relation to gender and diversity.

Enforcement (ENF) manuals are intended as a support and guide for officers in the execution of their enforcement-related responsibilities. ENF Chapter 12 was updated and disseminated agency-wide in 2022 to 2023.

ENF Chapter 12, Search, Seizure, Fingerprinting and Photography, Section 6.9. Change in language for officer consideration regarding GBA Plus, specifically in the context of disrobement searches and gender identification as per section 139 of the IRPA: “officers should be aware that other considerations may arise, specifically in the context of gender diversity, which includes all transgender, gender fluid, non-binary, two-spirit, cisgender and other identities”. Updated search options presented to the client are (a) male officers only, (b) females officers only, or (c) split search. The changes also provide additional instruction that although these options are specific to a person seeking entry into Canada and mandated by the IRPA, these principles should be applied in the inland context (search incidental to arrest) whenever possible; additionally to apply gender-neutral language and sensitivity to gender-related issues.

Supplementary links to external resources have also been added to manual updates to further encourage decision-making that promotes diversity. For example, ENF Chapter 12 now includes a link to the internationally recognized sexual orientation or gender identity of expression (SOGIE) definitions for additional information.

Supplementary information sources:

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: The program recognizes the value of, and is committed to, promoting GBA Plus as an intersectional tool designed to ask questions, challenge assumptions, identify potential impacts, and take into account diverse needs during client interactions and decision-making related to enforcement actions, particularly with persons who have been and continue to be marginalized based on gender, culture, ability, or other diverse factors.

The scope of the GBA Plus Data Collection Plan for the next reporting period will focus on a key program activity: A44 inadmissibility reports. This activity is captured in the program’s Performance Information Profile and Logic Model. The program will seek to identify the total number of all A44 reports written against Foreign Nationals in Canada from 2018 to 2023. This period has been identified to increase statistical reliability of potentially large-scale data, estimated to comprise more than ten thousand reports each year. Additionally, this up-to-date data will take into account recent changes to program policy, while also making a consideration for the unknown impact of COVID-19 on the data, specifically in 2020 due to border and travel restrictions implemented in response to the pandemic. The program’s objective is to analyze activity impacts in relation to individualized experiences, and the factors contributing to the disparities, including those within and outside of program control.  

Internal program data collection is guided by existing legislation and system-enabled options; therefore, we acknowledge the collection limitations of the data, and as such there may be imperfections in our analysis. However, by applying a GBA Plus lens to the available data collected, we will seek to identify real or potential key impacts and best practices to integrate and sustain the practice of GBA Plus in the program activity. Should an analysis of the data reveal hidden trends or inequalities of any specific marginalized groups, we aim to identify ways to improve the program to ensure that it does not perpetuate any existing inequalities.

The program will also seek to identify whether any opportunities exist, under the current legislation, to enhance data collection options for disaggregated data, to assist the program in future monitoring and reporting on equity within the activity itself.

To challenge the assumption that writing an A44 report affects everyone in the same way, we wish to explore whether there are disproportionate impacts:

  • Is it possible that the decision/action did not fully consider how various intersectional factors influence the enforcement outcome?
  • Have potential biases been considered in the language or approaches used?
  • Does the activity itself provide for gender neutral, culturally neutral or ability neutral language or physical attributes of the document itself?
  • How might attitudes and norms, whether those of the officer, the organization, and/or those of the institutions and society, impact the range of legislative options an officer considers and chooses?

In order to test this hypothesis and measure possible inequalities, the program intends to undertake the following actions to further introduce GBA Plus into its activities in 2023 to 2024:

  • Step 1: Request for the extraction of available quantitative and disaggregated data will be sent to the appropriate facilitating unit (Q2 2023 to 2024). For example:
    • Identify the total number of A44 reports written from 2018 to 2023, with the following GBA Plus datasets: Age; Gender; Citizenship; Country of Birth
    • Total number of Foreign Nationals allowed entry into Canada, per year from 2018 to 2023, to complete a comparative analysis and provide context to the activity under review
    • Data will be extracted from previous fiscal years, producing a report for each fiscal year identified. This will be followed by an additional report that analyzes historical trends spanning all fiscal years pulled
  • Step 2: Populate extracted data in a single Excel spreadsheet where it will be possible to group various combinations of identity factors for future analysis (Q2 2023 to 2024)
  • Step 3: Quality assurance on the data (e.g., to ensure there are no duplicate entries) (Q3 2023 to 2024)
  • Step 4: Examination of preliminary results by analyzing specific identify factors and combinations of identity factors. This process includes applying filters to the collected data in order to group it based on various combinations of intersectionality and then create a visual aid to assist in comparing the resulting data sets (Q3 2023 to 2024)
  • Step 5: Identify any trends or gaps in the available disaggregated data. Should an examination of the disaggregated data identify a pattern or trend that indicates different groups experience disproportionate outcomes based on intersectional factors, safeguards may need to be identified to strengthen equality through an examination of existing policy and program guidance (Q4 2023 to 2024 through Q1 2024 to 20
    Should any statistically significant trends be identified, the program will prepare a report detailing the patterns and trends, key impacts on diverse groups, and the policies and programs requiring review.
  • Step 6: Continue to promote and support GBA Plus training efforts within the program to support awareness and education (ongoing throughout the next reporting cycle)
  • Step 7: New reporting cycle begins (Q1 2024 to 2025)
    • Continue to monitor and report on GBA Plus practices and outcomes
    • Report initial key program impacts on gender and diversity

Planned initiatives for 2023 to 2024 in the GBA Plus implementation plan include all new or updated program resources to entail gender-neutral language and attention to GBA Plus in specific sections. The ENF Manual, intended as a support and guide for CBSA officers in the execution of their enforcement-related responsibilities, will see the following revisions in the next reporting cycle:

ENF Chapter 5, Writing 44(1) Reports: Consultation process completed in the current reporting period, and appropriate sections updated with GBA Plus-specific considerations; set for release in Q1 2023 to 2024.

ENF Chapter 6, Review of reports under subsection A44(2): Manual will be completed with GBA Plus specified information; set for release in Q1 2023 to 2024.

A new section has been added to provide guidance and resources on dealing with vulnerable persons, including victims of gender-based violence. Section 6.6.2, which deals with intersectionality considerations, will be revised to reflect the responsibility of officers to be sensitive to the possibility that SOGIE issues may exist in any case they encounter while executing their IRPA authorities. This includes following all relevant guidelines and procedures pertaining to SOGIE. Additionally, the updates will include mitigation considerations to challenge assumptions and unconscious bias, and ensure equitable treatment (e.g., removing communication barriers through consciousness of culture and gender). In terms of gender-based violence, the updates further provide considerations that violence may be in the form of physical, emotional/psychological, and/or cyber-violence, as well as intersectionality considerations.  

Program name: Removals

Program goals: The Removals Program monitors inland immigration enforcement cases subject to removal orders to ensure that removal proceedings align with the IRPA and associated regulations. As part of its enforcement of the IRPA, the CBSA has a statutory obligation to remove any foreign national that has been issued a removal order for violating the Act. The enforcement of the removal order is the last step of the enforcement continuum, where an investigation leads to the issuance and ultimately the execution of a removal order. When scheduling a removal from Canada, CBSA officers are mandated by law to enforce the removal as soon as possible and are currently applying certain GBA Plus considerations, such as those involving children and other vulnerable persons, when moving a case through the enforcement continuum to removal. 

Target population: A particular demographic group (foreign nationals who are subject to an enforceable removal order). Outside of nationality, GBA Plus identity factors do not contribute to the targeting of any particular group.

Distribution of benefits: All persons in Canada benefit from the activities carried out by the Removals Program, which are to protect the safety and security of Canada and the integrity of the immigration program. 

The benefit is for all persons in Canada (whether they are Canadian citizens, foreign nationals, or permanent residents). No GBA Plus identity factors are intended to benefit more than any other(s).

  Group
By gender  Third group: Broadly gender-balanced
By income level  Third group: No significant distributional impacts
By age group Second group: No significant inter-generational impacts or impacts generation between youth and seniors

Specific demographic group outcomes: As the target population of the program, foreign nationals with enforceable removal orders who have exhausted all avenues that could stay a removal comprise the group directly impacted by the program.

To date, the program has not identified any disproportionate outcomes for specific demographic groups. This will be accomplished once the data collection plan has been implemented.

The priority to remove specific foreign nationals indirectly impacts a range of groups, including family members allowed to remain in Canada, which may include Canadian children, spouses and other relatives. 

Key program impacts on gender and diversity: Not yet available. The program has created a GBA Plus Data Collection Plan (see below) to analyze potential program impacts on gender/diversity.

GBA Plus Data Collection Plan: The Removals Program is interested in learning whether any foreign nationals with particular identity factors or a combination of identity factors are impacted disproportionately during its discretionary options surrounding managing the removal process and assigning escorts to certain cases. Identifying disproportionate impact is the first step in a GBA Plus analysis that could lead to uncovering systemic bias.

Persons subject to a removal order have access to a number of recourse mechanisms. The program monitors cases subject to removal orders to ensure that removal proceedings align with the IRPA and associated regulations. During the triaging process, cases are reviewed and individuals who have exhausted all legal avenues are assigned to officers. The officer planning the removal performs a review of the file before conducting a removal interview. The officer will determine whether a person has obvious impediments to removal and whether the individual has access to a pre-removal risk assessment. Officers should review the immigration legislation which outlines exceptions for making an application for a risk assessment prior to removal. Once a case has been reviewed, an interview is conveyed to advise the foreign national of their obligation to leave Canada.

During this interview, the foreign national may indicate they have challenges that may delay their removal from Canada. The officer must work closely with the foreign national to overcome all impediments in order to enforce the removal. The IRPA stipulates that once a removal order becomes enforceable, the CBSA has a statutory obligation to enforce the removal order as soon as possible, hence officers have limited discretion in determining when a removal should be scheduled to account for challenges such as medical issues, best interest of the child, etc. This discretion is determined on a case-by-case basis and is not meant to address legislative stays of removal or impediments that may last several months or longer. When scheduling removal, the CBSA will determine whether there is any risk associated with the individual travelling, and if the threshold is met, the CBSA will assign escorts to travel with the individual.

The IT systems used to collect, assess, manage and report on removals are GCMS and NCMS. These electronic databases are in place to capture information relating to foreign nationals. They are systems used for immigration- and enforcement-related purposes that fall under the IRPA. Data collected in these systems is extracted using IBM Cognos Analytics. The objective is to analyze cases that are being processed for removal. The cohort will be approximately 19,000 cases.

The Removals Program will be looking at disaggregated data on the following identity factors:

Sex/Gender: This information is collected as a ternary element (female, male, X). Any other form of gender expression are not currently being captured in the data.

Based on the conclusion of the analysis of the collected disaggregate data, the program will determine whether there are any demographic groups with specific identity factors (as above) that are disproportionately impacted during removal arrangements. Through our analysis of potential impacts to diverse groups, we wish to collect data to ensure those being removed do not experience differential treatment due to systemic bias, unfair assumptions, or barriers due to a person’s intersectional identity factors. For example: Are there any demographic groups, such as those based on race, sex or gender, that CBSA regional offices tend to remove more quickly than others?

This data will be extracted from NCMS which is a real-time database that is refreshed on a daily basis. In other words, it is a snapshot of the inventory on the day that the statistics are extracted. To better identify historical (long-term) impact, data will be captured every year for a period of three fiscal years.  As such, the expected date of completion below will be repeated yearly until the multi-year data collection is completed. In the interim, should historical data be made available to the Removals Program, data will be collected for the past three fiscal years to expedite the analysis.

Planned actions:

Step 1: Pull the disaggregated data from the systems and populate in a single Excel spreadsheet where it will be possible to group various combinations of identity factors for future analysis (September 2023).

Step 2: Quality assurance on the data and analysis of potential data gaps that may skew results (e.g., to ensure there are no duplicate entries) (October to December 2023).

Step 3: Prepare remaining identify factors for analysis. This process includes applying filters to the collected data to group it based on various combinations of intersectionality and then create a visual aid to assist in comparing the resulting datasets (January 2024).

Step 4: Analyze the data to determine whether there are any historical trends in terms of the outcome of removal processes that may reveal barriers with specific groups (February to March 2024).

Step 5: Should any statistically significant trends be identified, prepare a report detailing the patterns and trends (March to June 2024).

This data collection plan will ultimately lead to a deeper dive in an attempt to uncover whether there is disproportionate treatment due to a person’s intersectional identity factors and its potential causes (e.g., systemic bias, unfair assumptions, barriers, etc.).

Response to parliamentary committees and external audits

Response to parliamentary committees

During the 2022 to 2023 fiscal year, the CBSA supported Government responses to seven reports tabled by parliamentary committees:

1. On February 2, 2022, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food tabled its first report entitled “Room to Grow: Strengthening Food Processing Capacity in Canada for Food Security and Exports”. On June 2, 2022, the Government’s response was tabled to address the Committee’s recommendations. The CBSA was implicated in two recommendations, namely Recommendation 12 regarding the Temporary Foreign Worker Program, and Recommendation 18 regarding checks on the quality of goods entering Canada. Refer to the Government’s response to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food’s first report  for more.

2. On February 8, 2022, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts tabled its eighth report entitled “Pandemic Preparedness, Surveillance, and Border Control Measures, of the 2021 Reports of the Auditor General of Canada”. On July 20, 2022, the Government’s response was tabled to address the Committee’s recommendations. The CBSA was implicated in one recommendation, namely Recommendation 7 regarding tools for border services officers. Refer to the Government’s response to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts' eighth report for more.

3. On February 28, 2022, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities tabled its second report entitled “Emerging from the Crisis: A Study of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Air Transport Sector”. On September 15, 2022, the Government’s response was tabled to address the Committee’s recommendations. The CBSA was implicated in one recommendation, namely Recommendation 31, and committed to supporting Transport Canada in their creation of a lessons learned report with recommendations on how to respond in the event of future emergency situations that lead to extended restrictions on travel. Refer to the Government’s response to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities' second report for more.

4. On April 25, 2022, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security tabled its third report entitled “A Path Forward: Reducing Gun and Gang Violence in Canada”. On September 15, 2022, the Government’s response was tabled to address the Committee’s recommendations. The CBSA was implicated in several recommendations, the main theme of which was closer collaboration with partners. This included consistent reporting of firearms smuggling data; the creation of uniform standards for tracing firearms involved in the commission of a crime; and strengthening partnerships with the Mohawk Council of Akwesasne. The Government’s response to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security's third report for more.

5. On June 20, 2022, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security tabled its sixth report entitled “Rise of Ideologically Motivated Violent Extremism in Canada”. On October 18, 2022, the Government’s response was tabled to address the Committee’s recommendations. The CBSA was implicated in one recommendation, namely Recommendation 16 in which the CBSA reaffirmed its commitment to uphold the highest professional standards in accordance with Canadian values and to address instances in which personnel behaviour does not meet expectations, including but not limited to supporting violent extremist movements. Refer to the Government’s response to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security's sixth report for more.

6. On June 22, 2022, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights tabled its fourth report entitled “Preventing Harm in the Canadian Sex Industry: A Review of the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act”. On October 17, 2022, the Government’s response was tabled to address the Committee’s recommendations. The CBSA was implicated in two recommendations, namely:

  • Recommendation 10, regarding legislation to repeal certain sections of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations that unfairly put migrant sex workers at elevated risk of violence and danger by making them unable to report these incidents without fear of deportation.
  • Recommendation 11, regarding how best to address the exploitation of migrant sex workers and to prevent findings of inadmissibility and deportation when such individuals report being victims of crime. This could involve amending the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations or other measures.

Refer to the Government’s response to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights' fourth report for more.

7. On November 16, 2022, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities tabled its seventh report entitled “Improving Efficiency and Resiliency in Canada’s Supply Chains.” On March 10, 2023, the Government’s response was tabled to address the Committee’s recommendations. The CBSA was implicated in one recommendation, namely Recommendation 25 regarding efforts to enhance CBSA capacity during surge periods to eliminate delays. Refer to the Government’s response to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities' seventh report for more.

In addition, the CBSA provided three progress reports to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts:

  1. On February 18, 2021, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts tabled its fifth report entitled “Immigration Removals, of the 2020 Spring Reports of the Auditor General of Canada.” On June 18, 2021, the Government’s response was tabled to address the Committee’s recommendations. The CBSA was implicated in Recommendations 1 through 4, including a commitment under Recommendation 4 to provide the Committee with quarterly reports on removal statistics until June 30, 2023. Refer to the Government’s response to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts' fifth report for more.
  2. On March 25, 2021, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts tabled its fourteenth report entitled “Taxation of E-Commerce, of the 2019 Spring Reports of the Auditor General of Canada.” On July 21, 2021, the Government’s response was tabled to address the Committee’s recommendations. The CBSA was implicated in Recommendations 3 and 4, including a commitment under Recommendation 3 to provide the Committee with reports on improving the validation and collection of sales taxes under the Courier Low Value Shipment Program. Refer to the Government’s response to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts' fourteenth report for more.
  3. On February 25, 2021, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Accounts tabled its twelfth report entitled “Respect in the Workplace”. On June 4, 2021, the Government’s response was tabled to address the Committee’s recommendations. The CBSA was implicated in Recommendations 1, 3 and 5, including a commitment to provide the Committee with reports on the results of the Agency’s strategy to address harassment, discrimination and violence in the workplace. Refer to the Government’s response to the Standing Committee on Public Accounts' twelfth report for more.

Response to audits conducted by the Office of the Auditor General of Canada (including audits conducted by the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development)

There were no audits requiring a response in the 2022 to 2023 fiscal year.

Response to audits conducted by the Public Service Commission of Canada or the Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages

There were no audits requiring a response in the 2022 to 2023 fiscal year.

Reporting on green procurement

This supplementary information table supports reporting on green procurement activities in accordance with the Policy on Green Procurement.

Context

The CBSA, which is bound by the Federal Sustainable Development Act (FSDS), has chosen not to develop an optional Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy Report for the 2022 to 2023 fiscal year. Instead, to comply with the reporting requirements under the Policy on Green Procurement, the Agency has completed this supplementary information section alongside its Departmental Results Report.

Greening Government commitments

The Government of Canada will transition to low‑carbon, climate-resilient, and green operations.

Target 1 - Reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from federal government facilities and fleet

Target

Reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from federal government facilities and fleet by 40% below 2005 levels by 2030 (with an aspiration to achieve this target by 2025) and 80% below 2005 levels by 2050 (with an aspiration to be carbon neutral).

Contributing action(s)

All new buildings and major building retrofits will prioritize low-carbon investments based on integrated design principles, and life-cycle and total-cost-of-ownership assessments, which incorporate shadow carbon pricing.

Corresponding departmental action(s)

All new buildings will be constructed to be net-zero carbon, unless a lifecycle cost-benefit analysis indicates net-zero-carbon-ready construction.

Starting in 2020, all newly constructed ports of entry will include infrastructure for charging stations, and a minimum of two charging stations per year will be installed in existing key locations, where feasible.

Existing buildings will undergo the following energy efficiency retrofits:

  • Initiate energy performance contract (EPC) upgrades
  • Replace inefficient lighting fixtures
  • Implement heat recovery and recommissioning
  • Complete fuel conversion from fossil fuels to non‑emitting sources

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s)

Starting point:
13.1 kt CO2 eq

Performance indicators:

Facilities:

  • GHG emissions from facilities in fiscal year 2005–06 (base year) = [X] ktCO2e
  • GHG emissions from facilities in current reporting fiscal year = [Y] ktCO2e
  • Percentage change in GHG emissions from facilities from base year to current reporting fiscal year = [1-Y/X] %
  • GHG emission intensity, by floor space (g CO2eq/m²)

Fleet:

  • GHG emissions from fleet in fiscal year 2005‑06 (base year) = [X] ktCO2e
  • GHG emissions from fleet in current reporting fiscal year = [Y] ktCO2e
  • Percentage change in GHG emissions from fleet from base year to current reporting fiscal year = [1-Y/X] %

Results achieved

Facilities:

  • GHG emissions from facilities in fiscal year 2005–06 (base year) = [X] 8.576 ktCO2e
  • GHG emissions from facilities in current reporting fiscal year = [Y] 6.648 ktCO2e
  • Percentage change in GHG emissions from facilities from base year to current reporting fiscal year = [1-Y/X] 22.5%
  • GHG emission intensity, by floor space (g CO2eq/m²) = 33.3 g CO2eq/m²

Fleet:

  • GHG emissions from fleet in fiscal year 2005-06 (base year) = [X] 4.404 ktCO2e
  • GHG emissions from fleet in current reporting fiscal year = [Y] 4.017 ktCO2e
  • Percentage change in GHG emissions from fleet from base year to current reporting fiscal year = [1-Y/X] 8.8%

Total: 12.8 kt CO2 eq

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target

Replacing CBSA-owned facilities in poor condition with new net-zero carbon (or net-zero-carbon-ready) construction, in addition to implementing energy efficient retrofits at existing buildings, will reduce energy consumption and lead to reduced GHG emissions from CBSA facilities.

Supports SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Target 2 - The CBSA’s fleet will be comprised of at least 80% zero-emission vehicles by 2030.

Contributing action(s)

Fleet management will be optimized, including by applying telematics to collect and analyze vehicle usage data on vehicles scheduled to be replaced.

Corresponding departmental action(s)

75% of new light-duty vehicle purchases will be zero-emission vehicles or hybrids.

All new executive vehicle purchases will be zero-emission vehicles or hybrids.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s)

Performance indicators:

  • Total number of vehicles that are ZEV, HEV or PHEV

  • Percentage of annual fleet purchases that are ZEV or hybrid

  • Percentage of ZEV in light-duty fleet

  • Number of executive vehicle ZEV or hybrid purchases

  • Number of vehicles logged via telematics

Starting point: 75%

Target: 75%

Results achieved

  • Purchased 158 new vehicles in 2022-23, of which 27 were Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEV) and 10 were Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV).

  • Percentage of annual eligible fleet purchases that are ZEV or hybrid: 81%

  • Percentage of ZEVs in light-duty fleet (cat. 1 to 4): 2% (23 ZEVs)

  • Executive vehicle ZEV or hybrid purchases: 0

  • Number of vehicles logged via telematics: 100

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target

As conventional vehicles are replaced over their lifetimes with zero emissions or hybrid vehicles, the CBSA’s fleet will reduce GHG emissions.

Supports SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Target 3 - Divert at least 75% (by weight) of non-hazardous operational waste from landfills by 2030.

Contributing action(s)

Other

Corresponding departmental action(s)

Track and disclose our waste diversion rates by 2022.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s)

Performance indicators:

From 2020-21:

  • Mass of non-hazardous operational waste generated in the year = [X] kg
  • Mass of non-hazardous operational waste diverted in the year = [Y] kg
  • Percentage of non‑hazardous operational waste diverted = [Y/X] %

Starting point: No waste data is available at this time.

Target: 75% diversion (by weight) by 2030

Results achieved

  • Mass of non-hazardous operational waste generated in the year = 271,840 kg
  • Mass of non-hazardous operational waste diverted in the year = 77,460 kg
  • Percentage of non‑hazardous operational waste diverted = 22%

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target

Tracking and disclosing our waste is the first step in identifying waste reduction opportunities. Reducing the generation of waste will help to reduce Scope 3 emissions from the production, transport and disposal of materials. Diverting waste from landfills reduces landfill gas and transport waste hauling emissions. Material recovery via recycling reduces emissions from the extraction and production of virgin materials.

Supports SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Target 4 - Divert at least 75% (by weight) of plastic waste from landfills by 2030.

Contributing action(s)

Other

Corresponding departmental action(s)

Eliminate the unnecessary use of single-use plastics in government operations, events and meetings.

When procuring products that contain plastics, promote the procurement of sustainable plastic products and the reduction of associated plastic packaging waste.

The CBSA will track and disclose waste diversion rates by 2022.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s)

Performance indicators:

From 2020-21:

  • Mass of plastic waste generated in the year = [X] kg
  • Mass of plastic waste diverted in the year = [Y] kg
  • Percentage of plastic waste diverted = [Y/X] %

Starting point: No waste data is available at this time.

Target: 75% diversion (by weight) by 2030

Results achieved

  • Mass of plastic waste generated in the year = 4,900 kg
  • Percentage of plastic waste diverted = 20%

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target

Tracking and disclosing our waste is the first step in identifying waste reduction opportunities. Reducing the generation of plastic waste will help to reduce Scope 3 emissions from the production, transport and disposal of materials. Diverting waste from landfills reduces landfill gas and transport waste hauling emissions. Material recovery via recycling reduces emissions from the extraction and production of virgin materials.

Supports SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Target 5 - Divert at least 90% (by weight) of all construction and demolition waste from landfills (striving to achieve 100% by 2030)

Contributing action(s)

Other

Corresponding departmental action(s)

Track and disclose our waste diversion rates by 2022.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s)

Performance indicators:

From 2020-21:

  • Mass of construction and demolition waste generated in the year = [X] tonnes
  • Mass of construction and demolition waste diverted in the year = [Y] tonnes
  • Percentage of construction and demolition waste diverted = [Y/X] %

Starting point: No waste data is available at this time.

Target: 90% diversion (by weight) by 2030

Results achieved

CBSA is exploring options to integrate this priority into all construction projects through its Port of Entry Design Standards & Guidelines and requests for proposals. No firm data is available at this time.

CBSA has ensured that 90% construction and demolition waste is diverted from demolition and construction projects such as the LBCP through the implementation of a clause for diversion of construction waste from landfills included in the IAR (Section E).

No construction waste was tracked in 2022-23.

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target

Reducing the generation of waste will help to reduce Scope 3 emissions from the production, transport and disposal of materials. Diverting waste from landfills reduces landfill gas and transport waste hauling emissions. Material recovery via recycling reduces emissions from the extraction and production of virgin materials.

Supports SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Target 6 - Track and disclose our potable water consumption and waste diversion rates by 2022

Contributing action(s)

Other

Corresponding departmental action(s)

Reduce water consumption and the demand on municipal water systems at CBSA-owned facilities, by using best-in-class water-use practices in new construction and major renovations, as well as designing all new buildings to effectively manage storm water.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s)

Performance indicator: Percentage of CBSA-owned facilities on municipal water systems with water meters installed

Starting point: Percentage of CBSA-owned facilities on municipal water meters installed as of 2020

Target: Track and disclose potable water consumption at 75% of CBSA-owned facilities on municipal water systems by 2022

Results achieved

In 2022-23, out of 31 custodial facilities on municipal water supply, 19 have water meters installed (61%).

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target

Reducing the CBSA’s water consumption will support water conservation and lower demands on municipal water systems.

Supports SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production).

Target 7 - Departments have developed measures to reduce climate change risks to assets, services and operations by 2022

1. Contributing action

Increase training and support on assessing climate change impacts, undertaking climate change risk assessments, and developing adaptation actions to public service employees, and facilitate sharing of best practices and lessons learned.

Corresponding departmental action(s)

Undertake an agency-wide climate change risk assessment to understand the wide range of climate change impacts that could potentially affect CBSA assets, services and operations across the country.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s)

Performance indicators:

  • Departmental climate risk assessment completed
  • Measures developed to reduce climate change risks to assets, services and operations

Starting point:
N/A

Target: Complete climate change risk assessment by 2023

Results achieved

The CBSA began taking important steps toward developing resilience to the changing climate in 2020-21, including the completion of a high-level risk assessment of key facilities in support of the CBSA’s land border modernization efforts.

In 2023, the CBSA completed a portfolio-wide Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment (CRiVA) for its assets, programs and services.

The CBSA has undertaken preliminary steps to implement climate risk mitigation measures at two high-priority sites (Walpole and Abbotsford-Huntingdon).

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target

Factoring climate variability and change into policy, programs, and operations is one of the most important ways to adapt to a changing climate and ensure long-term resilience.

Supports SDG 13 (Climate Action).

2. Contributing action

By 2021, adopt climate-resilient building codes being developed by National Research Council Canada.

Corresponding departmental action(s)

All major real property projects will integrate climate change adaptation into the design, construction and operation aspects.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s)

Performance indicator: Percentage of buildings constructed in the reporting year that conform to the NRC climate-resilient building codes

Starting point: 0 new buildings built in 2019-20

Target: 100%

Results achieved

The climate-resilient building codes have not yet been published by National Research Council Canada. The CBSA will integrate these codes into its design, construction and operational aspects once they are available.

The CBSA has implemented resiliency measures into the design of the LBCP.

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target

All major real property projects will integrate climate change adaptation into the design, construction and operation aspects.

Supports SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Target 8 - Use 100% clean electricity by 2025

Contributing action

Other

Corresponding departmental action(s)

Procure 100% of all electricity at CBSA custodial ports of entry and training facilities from clean electricity sources by 2025. Purchase megawatt hours of renewable electricity equivalent to that produced by the high-carbon portion of the electricity grid in regions with carbon emitting electricity generation.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s)

Performance indicators:

From 2020-21:

  • [Electricity consumption in the year = [X] kWh
  • Electricity consumption from non-emitting sources (including renewable energy certificates) in the year = [Y] kWh
  • Percentage of clean electricity = [Y/X] %

Starting Point: 86%

Target : 100%

Results achieved

In 2022-23, the CBSA’s electricity consumption was 37,589,481 kWh. The electricity consumption from non-emitting sources (including renewable energy certificates) was 32,860,962 kWh.

As of March 2023, the percentage of clean electricity at CBSA’s custodial ports of entry and training facilities is 89.5%.

By 2024-25, the national Service Level Agreement will officially take effect, allowing the CBSA to achieve 25% GHG emissions reductions from its global emissions. This will progress with all provinces participating. The Atlantic region (New Brunswick) will soon be participating through premium costs to utility billing, followed by the remainder of the provinces in the Quebec, Central, Prairie and Pacific regions, where PSPC (not CBSA) will pay an extra fee to offset emissions from these locations.

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target

The use of clean electricity eliminates GHG emissions in jurisdictions where electricity generation is not from clean renewable sources. Renewable Energy Certificates are purchased to offset carbon grid emissions and support the use of renewable energy sources having low environmental impacts, such as wind, solar, water, and biomass.

Supports SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Target 9 - Actions supporting the Greening Government goal and the Policy on Green Procurement

Contributing action 1

Departments will use environmental criteria to reduce the environmental impact and ensure best value in government procurement decisions.

Corresponding departmental action(s) 1a

Reduce the use of physical paperwork by means of optimizing the number of forms used, as well as increase the digitization of paper-based processes.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s) 1a

Performance indicator: Percentage reduction in the amount of physical paper forms

Starting point: As of 2019-20, the CBSA uses 642 different forms, of which 208 are hard copies.

Target: 10% reduction by 2023

Results achieved 1a

The CBSA reduced the amount of paper forms by 35% by converting them into electronic format.

As of March 2023, electronic forms accounted for 88% of CBSA forms.

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target 1a

Digitization and optimization of operational forms will reduce paper consumption.

Supports SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production).

Corresponding departmental action(s) 1b

Ensure that all new installations of Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) technologies in CBSA-operated facilities are energy efficient.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s) 1b

Performance indicator: Number of sites with energy efficient CCTV technology installed

Starting point: 0 new installations in 2019-20

Target: New installations in 25 facilities by 2025

Results achieved 1b

New energy efficient CCTV technology was installed at 36 facilities in the 2021- 2022 fiscal year.

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target 1b

Energy efficient systems will reduce energy consumption in facilities.

Supports SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Corresponding departmental action(s) 1c

Purchase laptops for employees in lieu of traditional desktop computers where feasible.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s) 1c

Performance indicator: Percentage of employees with a work laptop

Starting point: 34%

Target: 65% of employees will have a work laptop by 2023

Results achieved 1c

As of March 2023, 89% of employees are now utilizing laptops as their primary device.

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target 1c

By providing laptops to employees rather than desktops, the CBSA will contribute to reducing its energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. This will enable employees to bring laptops to meetings and reduce printing, as well as reduce Scope 3 emissions when employees choose to work from home.

Supports SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Contributing action 2

Support for green procurement will be strengthened, including guidance, tools and training for public service employees.

Corresponding departmental action(s) 2a

Ensure specialists in procurement have the necessary training and awareness to support green procurement.

Develop an onboarding package on a green procurement for all new procurement officers and functional authorities.

Starting in 2020, require all managers to complete the Canada School of Public Service course on Green Procurement as part of mandatory financial delegation authority training.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s) 2a

Performance indicator:
Percentage of specialists in procurement who have completed training on green procurement

Starting point: 50%

Target: 80%

Results achieved 2a

As of 2023, 66% of CBSA procurement specialists have completed training on green procurement.

The CBSA implemented a new delegation process built on the newly signed Delegation of Financial Signing Authority Matrix and Notes. The new process will help enforce training requirements like green procurement, aligning the process to obtain a procurement delegation with the one for financial authorities.

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target 2a

Green procurement incorporates environmental considerations into purchasing decisions and is expected to motivate suppliers to reduce the environmental impacts of their goods, services and supply chain.

Supports SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Contributing action 3

Other

Corresponding departmental action(s) 3a

Encourage employees to adopt sustainable work place practices and engage in greener initiatives through green teams, education and awareness.

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s) 3a

Performance indicators:

National engagement through the creation of green teams and green initiatives

Implementation of a zero waste meeting and event policy

Starting point: Development of an employee mobilization strategy in 2019-20

Target: Widespread implementation of employee mobilization

Results achieved 3a

In 2022 and 2023, the CBSA hosted an Environment Week event which included online webinars, engagement sessions and online outreach campaigns. Hundreds of CBSA employees participated in this event, increasing awareness Agency-wide.

The CBSA is set to complete the final draft of the plastics policy in 2023-24.

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target 3a

Employee mobilization supports the FSDS targets of waste and energy reduction through employee engagement and behavioural change towards workplace activities.

Supports SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action).

Contributing action4

Departments will adopt clean technology and undertake clean technology demonstration projects

Corresponding departmental action(s) 4a

N/A

Starting point(s), performance indicator(s), target(s) 4a

N/A

Results achieved 4a

N/A

Contribution by each departmental result to the FSDS goal and target 4a

N/A

Integrating sustainable development

The CBSA will continue to ensure that its decision‑making process includes consideration of FSDS goals and targets through its strategic environmental assessment (SEA) process. An SEA for a policy, plan or program proposal includes an analysis of the impacts of the proposal on the environment, including on relevant FSDS goals and targets.

Date modified: